Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't training developers to write more secure code also fall under the cost of detection? They're learning to identify and prevent defects early on.
I agree with Audra, Option D is the correct answer. Investing in testing and quality assurance upfront is way more cost-effective than fixing issues later on.
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Designing test cases and writing test scripts is all about detecting and identifying issues, so it fits the cost of detection category perfectly.
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Designing test cases and writing test scripts is all about detecting and identifying issues, so it fits the cost of detection category perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Dorian
22 days agoRusty
25 days agoTroy
6 days agoArt
13 days agoBrock
17 days agoDorethea
27 days agoCassi
29 days agoStephaine
1 days agoKaty
2 days agoCrissy
7 days agoRemedios
11 days agoMelvin
1 months agoTamie
1 months agoDorian
1 months agoAudra
1 months agoDana
28 days agoElke
29 days ago