Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't training developers to write more secure code also fall under the cost of detection? They're learning to identify and prevent defects early on.
I agree with Audra, Option D is the correct answer. Investing in testing and quality assurance upfront is way more cost-effective than fixing issues later on.
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Designing test cases and writing test scripts is all about detecting and identifying issues, so it fits the cost of detection category perfectly.
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Designing test cases and writing test scripts is all about detecting and identifying issues, so it fits the cost of detection category perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Rusty
5 days agoDorethea
7 days agoCassi
9 days agoMelvin
12 days agoTamie
15 days agoDorian
16 days agoAudra
17 days agoDana
8 days agoElke
9 days ago