Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam CT-TAE Topic 5 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 5
[All CT-TAE Questions]

You are working on a web-based application called Book Vault that allows people to upload books and order books. This application must be available on all major browsers.

You have been testing the application manually and management have asked you to consider automating some of the tests.

You have investigated a number of commercial and free tools which can automate tests at a web browser level and one tool in particular meets your requirements and you have implemented a trial version.

You have basic programming skills and the main goal is to automate a few functional tests to see if the tool is compatible with the application and can recognise the objects and controls.

Which scripting technique would be MOST suitable in this scenario in order to meet the objectives?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Viva at Sep 11, 2024, 10:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Justa
2 months ago
I don't know, man, capture-replay seems a little too 'set it and forget it' for my liking. I think I'd go with data-driven scripting to really put this tool through its paces. Plus, it's the most fun to say out loud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
2 months ago
I see the benefits of both options, but I think Capture-replay scripting might be more efficient for our initial testing phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
2 months ago
That's a good point, Glory. Data-driven scripting could be useful for testing various inputs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
I prefer Data-driven scripting as it allows for more flexibility in testing different scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
2 months ago
Structured scripting? Sounds like someone's trying to make this way more complicated than it needs to be. Just give me the capture-replay and let's get this show on the road!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
2 months ago
Model-based scripting? What is this, a sci-fi novel? I'm sticking with good old-fashioned capture-replay, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
Lera
1 months ago
I agree, capture-replay scripting is a good choice for automating tests in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
2 months ago
Capture-replay scripting is easier to use and requires less programming knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
2 months ago
I think model-based scripting is more advanced and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashandra
2 months ago
Data-driven scripting is the way to go, my dude. That way you can easily test all the different book types and user scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
Amina
1 months ago
Data-driven scripting is the way to go, my dude. That way you can easily test all the different book types and user scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
1 months ago
D) Model-based scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
2 months ago
C) Data-driven scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
2 months ago
B) Capture-replay scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
2 months ago
A) Structured scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evan
2 months ago
I agree with Jess, Capture-replay scripting is easy to implement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
2 months ago
I think Capture-replay scripting would be most suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
3 months ago
Capture-replay scripting sounds like the way to go. It's a no-brainer for getting those functional tests up and running quickly.
upvoted 0 times
Lera
2 months ago
D) Model-based scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
2 months ago
C) Data-driven scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
2 months ago
B) Capture-replay scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
2 months ago
A) Structured scripting
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel