Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam CT-TAE Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 2
[All CT-TAE Questions]

In order to achieve re-use of a TAS, where SHOULD the design for reuse occur?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Clarinda at Sep 19, 2024, 09:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Diego
2 months ago
Forget the options, let's talk about how many lines of code it takes to write a TAS. I bet it's more than a hundred, right? *laughs*
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
2 months ago
Hold up, are we sure this isn't a trick question? What if the answer is A) At the code level, and they're just trying to confuse us?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
2 months ago
I'm going with D) At the TAA level. Gotta think outside the box, you know? The TAS is just the tip of the iceberg.
upvoted 0 times
Cassi
1 months ago
D) At the TAA level could work too, it's all about looking at the bigger picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
2 months ago
I agree, C) At the TAS level is also important to ensure components are designed for reuse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
2 months ago
I think B) At the framework level is the way to go. It sets the foundation for reusability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sarina
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. B) At the framework level could also work, since that's where the reusable components would be defined.
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
1 months ago
That's true, but I think focusing on the framework level is more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
1 months ago
But wouldn't it also make sense to consider C) At the TAS level?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. That's where the reusable components are defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
2 months ago
I think B) At the framework level is a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paulene
2 months ago
I believe it should be at the TAS level, as that's where the actual re-use will happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
3 months ago
I agree with Samira, designing for reuse at the framework level makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
3 months ago
C) At the TAS level seems like the obvious choice here. That's where the design for reuse should happen, right?
upvoted 0 times
Johnson
2 months ago
I see your point, but focusing on reusability at the TAS level is crucial for overall efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
2 months ago
But wouldn't designing for reuse at the code level also be beneficial?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
2 months ago
I think it's important to consider reusability at the framework level as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
2 months ago
Yes, I agree. Designing for reuse at the TAS level makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
3 months ago
I think the design for reuse should occur at the framework level.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel