ISTQB Exam CT-TAE Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 1

You have implemented a keyword-driven scripting framework, which uses a test execution tool to run the tests. This has been in use for the past year and all of the teams now use this framework as the standard approach for test execution.

The teams all work on different aspects of the SUT and they have all experienced significant benefits in the use of this scripting framework. However, on closer examination, you have discovered that there are numerous instances where the teams have the same functionality to test but are using different keywords.

One of your objectives for improvement is to create consistency among the teams.

What is the BEST way to handle this situation?

AMove to a model-based approach to scripting where the models include the keywords.

BDo nothing, each team are working in isolation and they are all experiencing significant benefits in the way they are currently working.

CProvide each team with a set of guidelines and naming conventions for keywords.

DCreate a central library of keywords and associated definitions for each team to use.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Stephania at Jun 20, 2024, 05:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ernest

4 months ago

Option D all the way! A central library of keywords is the way to go. It'll make everything so much more organized and efficient. Plus, it'll keep the teams from going all rogue with their own custom keywords.

upvoted 0 times

Reyes

2 months ago

Absolutely, it will streamline the testing process and prevent any confusion or duplication of efforts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

3 months ago

I agree, having a central library will make it easier for teams to collaborate and ensure they are all on the same page.

upvoted 0 times

...

Letha

3 months ago

Option D sounds like the best solution. A central library of keywords will definitely bring consistency among the teams.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

3 months ago

Definitely, it would streamline the testing process and ensure that everyone is on the same page with the keywords they use.

upvoted 0 times

...

Douglass

3 months ago

I agree, having a central library of keywords would make it easier for teams to collaborate and share resources.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shalon

3 months ago

Option D sounds like the best solution. A central library of keywords would definitely bring consistency among the teams.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veda

4 months ago

I believe providing guidelines and naming conventions for keywords will also help in creating consistency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashton

4 months ago

I think creating a central library of keywords is the best option for consistency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

4 months ago

I agree with Malika, having consistent keywords will improve efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malika

4 months ago

I think we should move to a model-based approach with standardized keywords.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

4 months ago

Option A seems interesting, but I'm not sure it's the best fit here. Model-based scripting might be overkill if the teams are already using a keyword-driven framework.

upvoted 0 times

Kina

4 months ago

C) Provide each team with a set of guidelines and naming conventions for keywords.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alysa

4 months ago

A) Move to a model-based approach to scripting where the models include the keywords.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefanie

5 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think option B is a terrible idea. Just letting the teams do their own thing is not going to solve the consistency problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

5 months ago

Option C sounds good too. Providing guidelines and naming conventions could help, but a central library might be more effective in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

Sena

4 months ago

I agree, having a central library of keywords would definitely create consistency among the teams.

upvoted 0 times

...

Heidy

4 months ago

Option C sounds good too. Providing guidelines and naming conventions could help, but a central library might be more effective in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hubert

5 months ago

I think option D is the way to go. A central library of keywords will help ensure consistency across the teams and make it easier to maintain the framework in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

Vi

4 months ago

Yes, it will definitely help with maintaining the framework in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earleen

4 months ago

I agree, having a central library of keywords will save a lot of time and effort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

4 months ago

Option D is definitely the best choice. It will make everything more consistent.

upvoted 0 times

...