ISTQB Exam ATTA Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's Advanced Technical Test Analyst exam

Question #: 93
Topic #: 2

[All Advanced Technical Test Analyst Questions]

Part 7 "Test Process & Incident Management"

The development manager asks you to identify suitable test coverage entry criteria for a component test. Which TWO of the following would you recommend as appropriate for entry criteria to a component testing phase? 2 credits [K3]

A100% statement coverage

BNo critical outstanding defects

CTest log available

DCode review completed

EStatic analysis shows no major violations

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D, E

by Cecil at Aug 05, 2024, 03:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Glendora

20 days ago

I believe D is important too, code review can catch potential issues early on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

21 days ago

I would also consider C, having a test log available is crucial for tracking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

22 days ago

I agree with you, statement coverage and static analysis are important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

26 days ago

I think A and E are good entry criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernie

1 months ago

100% statement coverage? That's like trying to catch a greased pig with your bare hands. I'd go with B and E - keep it simple, keep it sane.

upvoted 0 times

Emeline

22 days ago

Yeah, focusing on critical defects and major violations makes more sense for entry criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

27 days ago

I agree, 100% statement coverage seems unrealistic. B and E sound more practical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizette

1 months ago

I believe having a test log available is crucial for tracking and documenting the testing process. So, C should also be included.

upvoted 0 times

...

Queenie

2 months ago

I would also consider D as a good entry criteria. Code review can help ensure quality before testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jean

2 months ago

Ah, the age-old dilemma of test coverage criteria. I'd recommend B and E - no critical defects and a clean static analysis. That way, we can catch the low-hanging fruit before diving into the nitty-gritty details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

2 months ago

Hmm, I'd have to say B and D. No critical defects and a completed code review - that's a solid foundation to start component testing. Maybe they'll throw in a free unicorn with the passing grade too.

upvoted 0 times

Layla

9 days ago

Haha, a free unicorn would definitely make the testing process more fun!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tenesha

11 days ago

A completed code review is definitely important to ensure the quality of the code being tested.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luke

22 days ago

I agree, having no critical defects is crucial before starting component testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominic

24 days ago

User4: E) Static analysis shows no major violations

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

1 months ago

User3: A) 100% statement coverage

upvoted 0 times

...

Tandra

1 months ago

User2: User Comment: Definitely, a completed code review is also important to ensure the quality of the code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

1 months ago

User1: I agree, having no critical defects is crucial for starting component testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lelia

2 months ago

I agree with you, Anabel. Statement coverage and static analysis are important for component testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karrie

2 months ago

C and D all the way! A test log and completed code review are must-haves to ensure the component is ready for testing. Who cares about statement coverage, as long as the basics are covered?

upvoted 0 times

Yolando

1 months ago

I think statement coverage is important too, it helps ensure that all parts of the code are being tested.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corinne

2 months ago

I agree, having a test log and completed code review are essential before starting component testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tess

2 months ago

100% statement coverage? Are they kidding? That's way too stringent for a component test. I'd go with B and E - no critical defects and a clean static analysis report.

upvoted 0 times