Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ATTA Topic 2 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 2
[All ATTA Questions]

Part 7 "Test Process & Incident Management"

The development manager asks you to identify suitable test coverage entry criteria for a component test. Which TWO of the following would you recommend as appropriate for entry criteria to a component testing phase? 2 credits [K3]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lemuel
2 months ago
Wait, wait, wait... 100% statement coverage? That's like asking for a unicorn to do the testing for us. Good luck with that one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
2 months ago
Static analysis showing no major violations? Now we're talking! Catching those bugs early is the way to go. Although, a few minor violations might be forgivable, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
Code review completed? Well, duh! Gotta make sure the code is up to snuff before we even think about testing it.
upvoted 0 times
Marge
1 months ago
E) Static analysis shows no major violations
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
2 months ago
User 3: D) Code review completed
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
2 months ago
A) 100% statement coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
2 months ago
User 2: B) No critical outstanding defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 months ago
User 1: A) 100% statement coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
Test log available? Hmm, I'd say that's a no-brainer. How else are we going to keep track of all the testing that's been done?
upvoted 0 times
Anissa
2 months ago
B) No critical outstanding defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
2 months ago
A) 100% statement coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kati
3 months ago
I believe D is important too. Code review completed ensures that the code is ready for testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
3 months ago
I would also consider C as a good entry criteria. Having a test log available can help track the testing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
3 months ago
No critical outstanding defects - absolutely! That's a must-have for any component testing phase. Can't have any showstoppers in the mix.
upvoted 0 times
Chandra
3 months ago
B) No critical outstanding defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
3 months ago
A) 100% statement coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mignon
4 months ago
I agree with you, Carole. Statement coverage and static analysis are important for component testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
4 months ago
100% statement coverage? That's a tall order! Wouldn't 80% be more realistic and still provide good coverage?
upvoted 0 times
Isadora
2 months ago
E) Static analysis shows no major violations
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
2 months ago
D) Code review completed
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
2 months ago
80% statement coverage is more practical and achievable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
B) No critical outstanding defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
2 months ago
A) 100% statement coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
2 months ago
80% statement coverage is more realistic and still effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
2 months ago
E) Static analysis shows no major violations
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
3 months ago
D) Code review completed
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
3 months ago
C) Test log available
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
3 months ago
B) No critical outstanding defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
3 months ago
A) 100% statement coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carole
4 months ago
I think A and E are good options for entry criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel