Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ATM Topic 2 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 2
[All ATM Questions]

Assume you are the Test Manager in charge of independent testing for avionics applications. You are in charge of testing for a project to implement three different CSCI (Computer Software Configuration Item):

- a BOOT-X CSCI that must be certified at level B of the DO-178B standard

- a DIAG-X CSCI that must be certified at level C of the DO-178B standard

- a DRIV-X CSCI that must be certified at level A of the DO-178B standard

These are three different software modules written in C language to run on a specific hardware platform.

You have been asked to select a single code coverage tool to perform the mandatory code coverage measurements, in order to meet the structural coverage criteria prescribed by the DO-178B standard. This tool must be qualified as a verification tool under DO-178B.

Since there are significant budget constraints to purchase this tool, you are evaluating an opensource tool that is able to provide different types of code coverage. This tool meets perfectly your technical needs in terms of the programming language and the specific hardware platform (it supports also the specific C-compiler).

The source code of the tool is available.

Your team could easily customize the tool to meet the project needs. This tool is not qualified as a verification tool under the DO-178B.

Which of the following are the three main concerns related to that open-source tool selection?

K4 3 credits (2 credits out of 3 credits correct, 1 credit point)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Joana
3 days ago
Totally, the code coverage support is key. Although, if the tool comes with a free 'eject seat' feature, I'd be willing to overlook a few other issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
19 days ago
Haha, forget about the RAM requirements, I'm more worried about whether the developers remembered to include a 'launch the missiles' button on the UI. Gotta keep those avionics pilots on their toes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
22 days ago
I also believe that the cost to qualify the tool as a verification tool is another major concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
23 days ago
I agree with Shawna. It's crucial for the tool to cover all levels A, B, and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
24 days ago
I agree, the cost to qualify the tool is a big one. And you can't forget about the confidentiality of the avionics company - the licensing scheme better be on point!
upvoted 0 times
Amie
3 days ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raul
1 months ago
The main concerns are definitely the cost to qualify the tool and whether it supports all the required code coverage levels. The usability and installation are important, but secondary to the compliance and certification issues.
upvoted 0 times
Elenore
19 days ago
F) Is the licensing scheme of the tool compatible with the confidentiality needs of the avionics company?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
22 days ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
24 days ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawna
1 months ago
I think the main concern is if the tool supports all types of code coverage required by the DO-178B standard.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel