Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATM Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 2
[All ATM Questions]

For which of the following activities would the costs be classified as a cost of detection? K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Noel at Sep 18, 2024, 09:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Samira
4 months ago
But wouldn't fixing field failures also be considered a cost of detection, since it involves identifying and correcting defects found in the field?
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
4 months ago
I agree with Delfina, because detecting defects during testing is part of the cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
5 months ago
C, no doubt about it. Though I wish I could just wave a magic wand and make all the defects disappear!
upvoted 0 times
An
3 months ago
D) Fixing field failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
3 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
3 months ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
4 months ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renea
5 months ago
Option C, easy peasy. Unless you're a software development superhero who writes bug-free code on the first try every time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
5 months ago
C is the right answer. Debugging and confirming bug fixes - that's textbook detection work right there.
upvoted 0 times
Reynalda
4 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
4 months ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
4 months ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delfina
5 months ago
I think the costs for re-running a test case would be classified as a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
5 months ago
Hmm, I'd have to go with C. Anything related to verifying and validating fixes should be considered a detection cost.
upvoted 0 times
Franklyn
4 months ago
D) Fixing field failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
4 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
4 months ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
4 months ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
5 months ago
Definitely C. Trying to catch and fix issues early in the testing phase is crucial for cost-effective quality assurance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
5 months ago
Option C seems the most appropriate here. Rerunning a test to verify a fix is a key part of the detection process.
upvoted 0 times
Toi
4 months ago
I agree, that definitely falls under cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
4 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel