Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTFL_Syll2018 Topic 2 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL_Syll2018 exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 2
[All CTFL_Syll2018 Questions]

You are responsible for applying the correct technique (or a review of the requirements document for a project to develop a new software application. You identify the reviewers and the required roles, including the meeting leader, who is the requirements document author, and a separate role for a scribe. Additionally, you decide to take a relatively informal approach to the requirements review. The goal of the review is to find defects in the requirements document, such as omissions, inconsistencies, and duplications. Another goal of the review is to improve the software application's usability and accessibility by considering the various stakeholders' viewpoints.

Which of the following statements BEST describes this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This scenario is using a walkthrough review type and a perspective-based review technique. A walkthrough is a type of review that is relatively informal and led by the author of the work product. A perspective-based review technique is a technique that involves reviewing the work product from different viewpoints or perspectives of various stakeholders. The scenario matches these descriptions, as it involves an informal approach, a meeting leader who is the author of the requirements document, and a goal of improving the software application's usability and accessibility by considering the various stakeholders' viewpoints. Option A is incorrect, as a pair review is a type of review that involves only two people, usually the author and another team member. Option C is incorrect, as a checklist-based review technique is a technique that involves reviewing the work product against a predefined list of items or criteria. Option D is incorrect, as it combines the incorrect descriptions of options A and C.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ivette
30 days ago
Ha, I bet the person who wrote this question was having a bit of fun. 'Relatively informal approach to the requirements review' - sounds like they're trying to keep the reviewers on their toes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
1 months ago
I'm going with Option B. The scenario sounds like a classic walkthrough review with a focus on different perspectives, which is exactly what a perspective-based review technique is all about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
1 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I was initially thinking Option D, but the mention of considering various stakeholder viewpoints makes me think Option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Glennis
20 hours ago
I agree, considering stakeholder viewpoints is a key aspect of a walkthrough review type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
12 days ago
I think Option B is the correct answer because of the mention of considering various stakeholder viewpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
13 days ago
I agree, considering stakeholder viewpoints is important in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
19 days ago
I think Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynette
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. The walkthrough review type is mentioned, and the checklist-based technique where specific defects are looked for matches the goals of the review.
upvoted 0 times
Hildegarde
8 days ago
It seems like Option C is the best choice for this scenario. It covers both the review type and technique needed for the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
24 days ago
The walkthrough review type mentioned in Option C would also allow for a thorough examination of the document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
30 days ago
I agree, the checklist-based technique would help in identifying specific defects in the requirements document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
1 months ago
I think Option C makes sense. The walkthrough review type and checklist-based technique align with the goals of the review.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helga
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) This scenario is using a pair review type and a perspective-based review technique could also be a valid option, as pair reviews involve two people working together to find defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
2 months ago
I agree with Laurena, because in a walkthrough review, the author leads the review and the focus is on understanding the requirements from different perspectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) This scenario is using a walkthrough review type and a perspective-based review technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
2 months ago
Option B seems like the best fit here. The scenario mentions a walkthrough review, which involves the author presenting the requirements document to a group of reviewers. And the perspective-based review technique where different stakeholder viewpoints are considered aligns with the goals described.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
26 days ago
Let's go with option B for the review technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
29 days ago
It's important to consider different stakeholder viewpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
1 months ago
I agree, a walkthrough review makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel