Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTFL_Syll_4.0 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL_Syll_4.0 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 1

[All CTFL_Syll_4.0 Questions]

Test automation allows you to:

Ademonstrate the absence of defects

Bproduce tests that are less subject to human errors

Cavoid performing exploratory testing

Dincrease test process efficiency by facilitating management of defects

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The question is about marking the correct sentences among the given statements related to defects, failures, and mistakes.According to the ISTQB glossary, the definitions of these terms are1:

Defect: A flaw in a component or system that can cause the component or system to fail to perform its required function, e.g. an incorrect statement or data definition. A defect, if encountered during execution, may cause a failure of the component or system.

Failure: An event in which a component or system does not perform a required function within specified limits.

Mistake: A human action that produces an incorrect result.

Therefore, out of the five given statements, only two are correct, namely:

A human mistake may produce a defect: This is true, as a mistake is a source or cause of a defect, e.g. a programmer may make a mistake in writing a code statement, which results in a defect in the software component.

When a defect exists in a system it may result in a failure: This is true, as a defect is a potential or actual cause of a failure, e.g. a defect in the software component may cause the system to fail to perform a required function when the defect is encountered during execution.

The other three statements are incorrect, namely:

Defects are a result of environmental conditions and are also referred to as ''Failures'': This is false, as defects are not a result of environmental conditions, but of mistakes or other factors, and defects are not the same as failures, but rather the causes of failures.

A system will totally fail to operate correctly when a failure exists in it: This is false, as a system may not necessarily fail completely or stop operating when a failure occurs, but may continue to operate with reduced functionality or performance, or with incorrect results.

Defects occur only as a result of technology changes: This is false, as defects can occur due to various reasons, not only technology changes, such as human mistakes, design flaws, requirement changes, hardware failures, etc.

1: ISTQB Glossary of Testing Terms 4.0, 2023, available at ISTQB) and ASTQB).

by Wenona at Jun 23, 2024, 10:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL_Syll_4.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kattie

9 months ago

Wait, can automation really replace exploratory testing?

upvoted 0 times

...

Silvana

9 months ago

Totally agree, automation boosts efficiency big time!

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

9 months ago

A is misleading; you can't prove absence of defects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lasandra

10 months ago

I disagree, exploratory testing is still super important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

10 months ago

Test automation definitely reduces human errors!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsay

10 months ago

I thought automation was supposed to complement exploratory testing, so C doesn't sound right to me at all.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilberto

10 months ago

I feel like D could be a good answer since automation does help manage defects better, but I’m torn between that and B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodolfo

10 months ago

I remember a practice question that mentioned automation can't prove the absence of defects, so A seems wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

11 months ago

I think test automation helps reduce human errors, so maybe B is the right choice? But I'm not completely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chuck

11 months ago

Okay, I've got this. Test automation helps demonstrate the absence of defects, produces more reliable tests, and increases efficiency by making it easier to manage defects. I'm confident I can nail this question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanjuana

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know test automation is important, but I'm not sure I fully understand all the potential benefits. I'll have to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

11 months ago

This is a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to focus on the benefits of test automation, like reducing human errors and improving efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

11 months ago

Wait, I'm a bit confused. Does test automation really avoid exploratory testing? That doesn't seem right to me. I'll have to double-check my understanding of the pros and cons of automation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shasta

11 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The question is asking which opinion is not expressed, so I need to identify the one that is not a standard audit opinion. I'll carefully consider each option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

11 months ago

I think I saw a practice question about the limits on the ELM Repository before; five layers sounds familiar, but I can't recall if that was a hard limit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

1 year ago

I wonder if the test automation can also do my taxes and walk my dog. That would be truly efficient!

upvoted 0 times

Carmen

1 year ago

D) increase test process efficiency by facilitating management of defects

upvoted 0 times

...

Annett

1 year ago

Haha, that would be convenient!

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulina

1 year ago

B) produce tests that are less subject to human errors

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

1 year ago

A) demonstrate the absence of defects

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Mee

1 year ago

A) is a bit misleading. Automation can't prove the absence of defects, it just helps find them more efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

Lizette

1 year ago

A) is correct, automation helps find defects more efficiently but doesn't guarantee their absence

upvoted 0 times

...

Royal

1 year ago

D) increase test process efficiency by facilitating management of defects

upvoted 0 times

...

Willie

1 year ago

B) produce tests that are less subject to human errors

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Sabine

1 year ago

D) seems like a good one. Automation can help with managing defects and improving overall test efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashanti

1 year ago

I'm not sure about C) - I think exploratory testing is still important even with automation.

upvoted 0 times

Thad

1 year ago

D) increase test process efficiency by facilitating management of defects

upvoted 0 times

...

Verdell

1 year ago

C) I agree, exploratory testing is still important

upvoted 0 times

...

Garry

1 year ago

B) produce tests that are less subject to human errors

upvoted 0 times

...

Odette

1 year ago

A) demonstrate the absence of defects

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Howard

1 year ago

I believe test automation can increase test process efficiency by facilitating management of defects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

1 year ago

B) sounds like the correct answer to me. Test automation can definitely reduce human errors in testing.

upvoted 0 times

Corinne

1 year ago

Automation is a great way to improve the accuracy and efficiency of testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darci

1 year ago

I agree, automation can help produce tests that are less prone to human errors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ardella

1 year ago

Absolutely, automation can make the testing process more efficient and reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irma

1 year ago

Yes, you're right. Test automation can definitely help reduce human errors in testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Lili

1 year ago

I agree with Joana, it also helps in producing tests that are less subject to human errors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joana

1 year ago

I think test automation allows us to demonstrate the absence of defects.

upvoted 0 times

...