Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTFL-AuT Topic 4 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AuT exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 4
[All CTFL-AuT Questions]

You are a tester In a learn and you are supposed to test diagnostic functions and bus communications on the CAN bus. The development team provides you with compiled software code and control unit hardware. Which test environment Is the best choice considering the test types?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Elli at Oct 24, 2024, 11:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-AuT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Bernardo
2 months ago
You know, I bet the development team would love it if we just jumped straight to the vehicle. But I think I'll go with option C and keep it in the HIL environment.
upvoted 0 times
Denny
17 days ago
It's important to test with other participants to ensure everything works smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
18 days ago
I agree, testing in a HIL environment would be closer to reality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
19 days ago
Option C sounds like a good choice for testing the bus communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zona
2 months ago
Ha! Testing in the actual vehicle? That's a bit overkill, don't you think? Option C sounds like the perfect balance between realism and practicality.
upvoted 0 times
Pok
25 days ago
Testing in the actual vehicle does seem like a lot of work, option C sounds like a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
29 days ago
I prefer option B for testing the performance of bus communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
1 months ago
I think option A could also be a good choice for cost efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jettie
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the best choice. Integrating the compiled software code into an environment model is the most cost-effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
Twana
26 days ago
True, but MiL test environment still provides a good simulation for testing purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
28 days ago
But what about option C? Testing with other participants seems more realistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
1 months ago
I agree, MiL test environment is the way to go for testing diagnostic functions and bus communications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
1 months ago
Option A is definitely the best choice. It's cost-efficient and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pedro
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B sounds promising too, as testing the bus performance in a SIL environment could give us valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
Refugia
2 months ago
User 4: I'm not sure, maybe we should consider testing in the vehicle as well to ensure everything works properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
2 months ago
User 3: Option B could be useful too, testing bus performance in a SIL environment could provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, but option C also sounds good as we can test bus communication with other participants in a realistic setting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
2 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the best choice, as we can integrate the software code into an environment model easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katie
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe C) A hi test environment is better as it allows testing bus communication with other participants close to reality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
3 months ago
I think A) A MiL test environment is the best choice because we can integrate the software code cost efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
3 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Testing the bus communication with other participants in a HIL environment seems like the most realistic approach.
upvoted 0 times
Solange
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but testing in the vehicle seems like the most practical option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
2 months ago
I believe option B in a SaL test environment would provide better performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
2 months ago
I think option A in a MiL test environment would be more cost efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
3 months ago
I agree, option C in a HIL environment is the most realistic choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel