BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTFL-AuT Topic 11 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AuT exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 11
[All CTFL-AuT Questions]

You are a tester In a learn and you are supposed to test diagnostic functions and bus communications on the CAN bus. The development team provides you with compiled software code and control unit hardware. Which test environment Is the best choice considering the test types?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Sena at Jul 07, 2024, 04:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-AuT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Micheline
3 months ago
Option D, eh? So they want us to turn the car into a giant diagnostic tool. Next thing you know, they'll be asking us to test the horn by sticking our heads out the window.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
3 months ago
Ah, the old 'diagnosis functions and bus communications' dilemma. I say we just duct tape the whole system and see if it still works. Problem solved!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
3 months ago
Option D? Really? Testing in the actual vehicle? That's like trying to learn how to drive by jumping straight into a Formula 1 car. No, thanks!
upvoted 0 times
Ashlyn
2 months ago
C) A hi test environment, as the bus communication with other participants can be tested dose to reality
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
2 months ago
B) A Sal test environment, since the performance of the bus communication can be tested better in this test environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
2 months ago
A) A MiL test environment, as the compiled software code can be Integrated cost efficiently into an environment model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nadine
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. A MiL test environment could be a cost-effective way to start, and then move to HIL later on. Just my two cents.
upvoted 0 times
Alexis
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. A MiL test environment could be a cost-effective way to start, and then move to HIL later on. Just my two cents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
3 months ago
C) A hi test environment, as the bus communication with other participants can be tested close to reality
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
3 months ago
A) A MiL test environment, as the compiled software code can be Integrated cost efficiently into an environment model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Juan
4 months ago
I agree, Option C is the way to go. Getting as close to real-world conditions as possible is key for these types of tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
4 months ago
Option C seems the best choice. Testing the bus communication with other participants in a HIL environment is crucial for ensuring realistic test conditions.
upvoted 0 times
Carmen
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the most realistic choice for testing the bus communication with other participants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
4 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for testing the diagnostic functions and bus communications on the CAN bus.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Remedios
4 months ago
I see both points, but I think B) A SaL test environment might be more suitable for testing the performance of bus communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe C) A HiL test environment is better as it allows us to test bus communication with other participants close to reality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
4 months ago
I think A) A MiL test environment is the best choice because we can integrate the software code cost efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel