New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTFL-AuT Topic 10 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AuT exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 10
[All CTFL-AuT Questions]

You are a tester In a learn and you are supposed to test diagnostic functions and bus communications on the CAN bus. The development team provides you with compiled software code and control unit hardware. Which test environment Is the best choice considering the test types?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Aliza at Sep 08, 2024, 10:28 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-AuT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Filiberto
2 months ago
I agree with Quentin, testing with other participants is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
2 months ago
C is the way to go. Testing the bus communication close to reality is the best way to ensure it works as intended when deployed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
2 months ago
Haha, D is a bit too extreme. We don't want to wait until the vehicle is ready to start testing this stuff, do we? Time is money, my friends!
upvoted 0 times
Carline
1 months ago
C) A hi test environment, as the bus communication with other participants can be tested dose to reality
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
1 months ago
B) A Sal test environment, since the performance of the bus communication can be tested better in this test environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
2 months ago
A) A MiL test environment, as the compiled software code can be Integrated cost efficiently into an environment model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elza
2 months ago
I'm not sure about A. A MiL test environment might not be sufficient to thoroughly test the bus communication and diagnostic functions.
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
1 months ago
Kaitlyn: I see your point, maybe C) is a better option after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 months ago
User 3: I agree with Kati, testing in a hi test environment is closer to real-world conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe C) A hi test environment is more realistic for testing bus communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
2 months ago
I think A) A MiL test environment is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe C) A HiL test environment is more realistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
3 months ago
I think A) A MiL test environment is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
3 months ago
B sounds like a good option to me. Sal test environment will allow us to better evaluate the performance of the bus communication, which is a key aspect of this testing.
upvoted 0 times
Jesusa
3 months ago
I think A MiL test environment could also be a good choice, as it allows for cost-efficient integration of the software code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
3 months ago
I agree, testing the bus communication performance is crucial for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmela
3 months ago
I think C is the best choice here. Testing the bus communication with other participants in a HIL environment is crucial for ensuring it works as expected in the real-world scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Sarah
3 months ago
Yeah, testing the bus communication with other participants in a HIL environment is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
3 months ago
I think C is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel