iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam

Question #: 64
Topic #: 2

[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Which of the following would you expect to be most likely an example of a demotivating factor for testers?

K2 1 credit

AThe management asks the testers to be kept informed about the intensity, quality and results of testing

BThe testers' recommendations to improve the system or its testability are adopted by the development team

CThe same regressions tests are manually executed by the same testers, for every product release, without regression test tools

DThe testers are assessed on whether and how often they detect important and critical failures

ETest quality is measured by counting the number of customer/user reported problems.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C, E

by Lucina at Jul 18, 2024, 09:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Desmond

4 months ago

Ha! Option E is a joke. Counting user-reported problems as a measure of test quality? That's just setting the testers up for failure.

upvoted 0 times

Gianna

4 months ago

Testers should be assessed on their ability to detect important failures, not just the number of reported problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerri

4 months ago

Yeah, it's unfair to the testers to be judged based on user-reported problems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josue

4 months ago

I agree, option E is definitely not a good measure of test quality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alecia

4 months ago

I still think option C is the worst, it's just repetitive and doesn't utilize their skills.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cary

4 months ago

That's true, but at least it shows the importance of their role in detecting critical issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylin

5 months ago

But wouldn't option D also be demotivating? Being assessed on failures can create pressure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alecia

5 months ago

I agree with Cary, doing the same manual regression tests repeatedly can be frustrating.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

5 months ago

I can't imagine anything more demotivating than being assessed on just the number of bugs found. Shouldn't it be about the quality and impact of the bugs caught?

upvoted 0 times

Evangelina

4 months ago

D) The testers are assessed on whether and how often they detect important and critical failures

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

4 months ago

C) The same regressions tests are manually executed by the same testers, for every product release, without regression test tools

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

4 months ago

A) The management asks the testers to be kept informed about the intensity, quality and results of testing

upvoted 0 times

...

Royce

5 months ago

Option C seems like a real pain. Doing the same manual regression tests over and over? No wonder the testers would be demotivated.

upvoted 0 times

Chuck

4 months ago

C) The same regressions tests are manually executed by the same testers, for every product release, without regression test tools

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlie

4 months ago

A) The management asks the testers to be kept informed about the intensity, quality and results of testing

upvoted 0 times

...

Cary

5 months ago

I think option C would be demotivating for testers.

upvoted 0 times

...