New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 1
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

For which of the following activities would the costs be classified as a cost of detection? K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Elmira at Sep 14, 2024, 11:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ciara
2 months ago
Wait, so we're not supposed to just guess randomly and hope for the best? Darn, there goes my test-taking strategy...
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
2 months ago
C is the way to go! Verifying a fix is like double-checking your work - gotta love that attention to detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
2 months ago
I'm going with D. Fixing field failures is clearly a cost of detection, right?
upvoted 0 times
Thad
2 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
2 months ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Titus
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. B seems reasonable too, training developers could help detect issues earlier.
upvoted 0 times
Phil
2 months ago
D) Fixing field failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
2 months ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D, fixing field failures, could also be considered a cost of detection because it involves identifying and correcting defects in the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
3 months ago
I think the answer is C. Re-running a test case to verify a fix is definitely a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
2 months ago
D) Fixing field failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
2 months ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
2 months ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 months ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
3 months ago
I agree with Rodolfo, option C involves detecting defects so it would be classified as a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
3 months ago
I think the cost of detection would be for option C, re-running a test case to verify a fix.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel