BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Topic 7 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TA_Syll2019 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 7
[All CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Questions]

You have been given a test charter to conduct exploratory testing for accepting credit and debit cards for an e-commerce system. You started with the credit cards and you have found that, valid or

invalid, they are never accepted. You have logged this as a defect. What should you do now?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The correct answer is D) Automate the testing for the credit card exploratory tests so they can be used for confirmation testing after the defect is fixed.

A) Enter your exploratory test cases with detailed test steps into the Test Management System

This is incorrect because entering the test cases into the Test Management System is not enough to document and track the exploratory testing process. The test cases should also include the expected results, actual results, and defects found during the testing. Moreover, the test cases should be organized into a clear and logical structure that reflects the test charter and scope.

B) Close the session and start a new session with a new charter

This is incorrect because closing and starting a new session with a new charter would mean losing all the information and data collected during the previous session. This would make it difficult to resume and continue the testing process from where it left off. Instead, it would be better to use a consistent and stable session with a single charter that covers all the requirements and features of the system.

C) Continue the session and conduct the testing for debit cards

This is incorrect because continuing the session and conducting only one type of card (debit) would not provide a comprehensive coverage of all possible scenarios and outcomes of accepting credit cards. It would also limit the scope of testing to only one aspect of payment processing, which may not reflect all the business rules, validations, exceptions, or integrations involved in this domain.

D) Automate the testing for the credit card exploratory tests so they can be used for confirmation testing after the defect is fixed

This is correct because automating some or all of the exploratory tests can help to save time, effort, and resources by reducing manual effort and increasing efficiency. It can also help to improve accuracy, consistency, and reliability by eliminating human errors and biases. Moreover, automating some or all of the exploratory tests can enable them to be reused for confirmation testing after fixing any defects found during exploratory testing. Confirmation testing is a type of functional testing that verifies that all requirements are met by performing regression tests on previously tested functionality1.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lynelle
5 months ago
Both A and D seem reasonable. Automation could ensure consistent retesting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards D. Automating the tests after fixing the defect sounds more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
6 months ago
But wouldn’t it be better to test debit cards next, like option C suggests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
6 months ago
I think option A makes sense. Documenting test cases might be helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
6 months ago
Yeah, it’s asking what to do after recording a defect with credit cards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
6 months ago
Interesting question on exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel