Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Topic 4 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TA_Syll2019 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 4
[All CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Questions]

The Technical Test Analyst has created a suite of keyword-driven tests to be used to test a calendar creation application. Because users may enter erroneous data, error checking must be

handled with the automation. What is the best way to test the error conditions and still use the keyword-driven tests?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Denise
1 months ago
Option C might work, but then we'd have to maintain separate keywords for the happy path and error conditions. Keeping it all in one place with Option A sounds more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine the keywords for the error cases: 'EnterInvalidDate', 'ClickSaveWithoutRequiredFields' - that would be hilarious!
upvoted 0 times
Adelaide
19 days ago
D) Create manual tests for the error conditions and provide only valid data for the keyword tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
22 days ago
C) Create new keywords to handle the error situations
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
28 days ago
B) Create a suite of data-driven tests that will provide all possible errors
upvoted 0 times
...
William
29 days ago
A) Create test data for the keywords that includes error data and verifies the proper error is returned
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pauline
2 months ago
I agree with Mariann. Option A allows us to keep the automation unified and comprehensive. No need to create a separate suite of data-driven tests just for the errors.
upvoted 0 times
Lynette
1 months ago
Agreed, keeping the automation unified is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
1 months ago
It's important to verify the proper error is returned in the automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
1 months ago
Creating new keywords just for errors seems like unnecessary extra work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
1 months ago
I agree, it keeps the automation unified and comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
1 months ago
I think option A is the best way to handle error conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
2 months ago
Creating test data for the keywords with error data is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
2 months ago
I think option A is the best way to handle error conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincenza
2 months ago
I prefer option D, manual tests for error conditions and valid data for keyword tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe creating new keywords for error situations is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
2 months ago
I think option A is the best way to test error conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward approach. We can capture the error cases as part of the keyword-driven tests and validate the proper error handling.
upvoted 0 times
Hassie
1 months ago
It's important to cover all possible error scenarios to ensure the application is robust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
1 months ago
We can easily verify that the correct errors are returned by including error data in the keyword-driven tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
1 months ago
Creating test data with error cases for the keywords is a good way to ensure proper error handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
2 months ago
Creating test data with error cases for the keywords seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
2 months ago
I agree, option A sounds like the best way to handle error conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
2 months ago
I agree, option A sounds like the best way to handle error conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel