iSQI Exam CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Topic 4 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TA_Syll2019 exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 4

[All CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Questions]

A Test Analyst is investigating what should be tested for interoperability between two systems. In addition to looking at the information exchange between the systems, what else should be

identified for testing?

AThe information exchange between the systems and the users

BThe information exchange between each system and its environment

CThe information exchange between the business analyst and the end user

DThe information exchange between the test automation and the test management system

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is A. Create test data for the keywords that includes error data and verifies the proper error is returned.

Create test data for the keywords that includes error data and verifies the proper error is returned

This is the best way to test the error conditions and still use the keyword-driven tests because it allows the reuse of the existing keywords and functions, while providing different inputs and expected outputs for the test cases. It also ensures that the error checking is automated and consistent, and that the test coverage is adequate1.

Reference =

Keyword Driven Testing Framework with Example2, Section How to create Keyword Driven Framework

What is Keyword Driven Testing: A Detailed Tutorial With Examples3, Section How to perform Keyword Driven Testing

KEYWORD DRIVEN TESTING4, Section How to do Keyword Driven Testing

by Alverta at Aug 05, 2024, 04:39 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Winfred

7 months ago

I think creating manual tests for the error conditions is necessary to ensure thorough testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luther

7 months ago

Option A is the way to go, my dudes. Keyword-driven tests with error data? That's the secret sauce right there. Gotta love those automated tests that just work, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

7 months ago

I believe creating new keywords to handle the error situations could also be a good approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Misty

8 months ago

Ooh, option B looks tempting. Data-driven tests for all the errors? Sign me up! Gotta cover all our bases, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Lenita

7 months ago

Data-driven tests can definitely help in identifying and addressing any potential issues that may arise with erroneous data entry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

7 months ago

I agree, it's important to make sure we test for all possible error conditions to ensure the application is robust.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

7 months ago

Option B does seem like a thorough approach. Covering all possible errors with data-driven tests is a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tran

8 months ago

I agree with Theresia, it's important to verify the proper error is returned.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronica

8 months ago

Hah, I'd steer clear of option D. Ain't nobody got time for manual tests when we've got these sweet keyword-driven suites!

upvoted 0 times

...

Theresia

8 months ago

I think the best way is to create test data for the keywords that includes error data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisbeth

8 months ago

I'm feeling option C on this one. New keywords to handle the errors? Sounds like a clean and efficient approach to me.

upvoted 0 times

Ellen

6 months ago

Option D might be a good choice too. Creating manual tests for error conditions could provide more control over the testing process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Farrah

6 months ago

I'm leaning towards option B. Creating a suite of data-driven tests for all possible errors seems comprehensive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brigette

7 months ago

I agree with you, option A sounds like a practical approach to ensure proper error handling.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andra

7 months ago

I think option A is the way to go. Creating test data for the keywords with error data seems like a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

8 months ago

I prefer option D, manual tests for error conditions provide more accurate results.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

8 months ago

I think option B could also be a good approach to cover all possible errors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

8 months ago

I disagree, I believe creating new keywords for error situations is more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bronwyn

8 months ago

Option A for sure! That's the way to go - cover all the bases with error data in the keywords. No need to get fancy with additional tests or manual checks.

upvoted 0 times