Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTAL-ATT Topic 2 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

You are working in a project that developed a product that has reached a stable state and is

deployed on different HW configurations all over Europe.

You management decided to use your project as Proof of Concept for adopting CI as a new way of

working. The POC was implemented on one set of hardware and was successful.

Which of the following actions is a good next step?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Deandrea at Jul 12, 2024, 03:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Amie
1 day ago
I disagree, B might be better for quicker feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
7 days ago
A is definitely the way to go! Testing all configurations is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
13 days ago
I like the idea of dynamically selecting tests in option D. It sounds efficient, but I wonder if it could complicate the CI process too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
19 days ago
We practiced a similar question where reducing tests was mentioned, but I think that could lead to missing critical issues. Option C seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
24 days ago
I'm not sure about reducing UI tests; I feel like they are crucial for user experience. Maybe option B isn't the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
30 days ago
I remember we discussed the importance of testing across different configurations, so I think option A makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
30 days ago
Reducing the number of tests seems risky - we want to make sure we're thoroughly testing the product. I'm leaning towards the option to dynamically select tests based on changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
1 month ago
Enabling different test configurations in the CI process sounds like a good way to ensure the product works across the various hardware setups. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
1 month ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully to make sure I understand the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
1 month ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the next steps in implementing CI. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
1 month ago
Speeding up test execution by decreasing UI testing could be tempting, but I'm worried that might compromise the quality of the testing. I think I'll go with the first option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
1 month ago
I’m leaning towards Option D, but I’m not completely confident. I remember we practiced how to derive results from relations, so I hope that helps!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
1 month ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about modifying the columns, but I'm not sure if there are any restrictions on the changes. I'll have to read through the options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
1 year ago
I don't know about you, but I'm feeling a bit 'hardware-y' today. Anyone else up for a game of 'Guess the CPU'?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
1 year ago
Dynamically selecting tests based on changes? Brilliant! That's a great way to optimize the CI process and get faster feedback.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
1 year ago
It would definitely help us focus on executing only the test cases affected by changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 year ago
Implementing code to dynamically select CI tests sounds like a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 year ago
I agree, it would help us test the different hardware configurations deployed in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
1 year ago
I think enabling different test configurations in the CI process is a good next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olen
1 year ago
Reducing the number of tests? That sounds like a recipe for disaster. We need to ensure we're catching all potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
1 year ago
I see both points, but I think option A is more important for ensuring our product works on all configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better. We should only run tests affected by changes to save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 year ago
Decreasing UI testing might not be the best idea. It's important to maintain comprehensive testing coverage, even if it takes longer.
upvoted 0 times
Glendora
1 year ago
D) Implement code to dynamically select CI tests, executing only test cases affected by changes
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 year ago
B) I agree, reducing UI testing might lead to missing critical bugs. It's better to have comprehensive testing coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
A) Enable different test configurations in the CI process to test different configurations that are deployed in the market
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leila
1 year ago
I think option A is a good next step. We need to test different configurations in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 year ago
I think option A is the way to go. Testing different hardware configurations is crucial to ensure the product works reliably across the market.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
1 year ago
Alex: That way, we can catch any potential issues before they reach the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
1 year ago
We should definitely focus on expanding our test configurations in the CI process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 year ago
Yes, it's important to cover all possible scenarios to ensure the product's stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
1 year ago
I agree, testing different hardware configurations is essential for reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel