iSQI Exam CTAL-ATT Topic 3 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam

Question #: 48
Topic #: 3

You need to implement a Java class that validates a password entry field. The validation critena states that the password must:

1. be a minimum of 8 characters

2 contain at least one special character.

You are focusing on validation criterion 1 and have written a test class that checks that a 7 character password entry will fail validation.

You have written code designed to make this test class pass, however, on first execution of the test class it has failed

What should you do next9

SELECT ONE OPTION

ARepair the failing code and re-execute it for the test class

BDevelop a test class with a 9 character password containing one special character and re-execute the code

CAdd code to cover special character validation criterion 2

DRefactor the failing code to improve its design and structure

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Virgie at Sep 13, 2024, 01:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Maynard

1 months ago

I think the best approach is to repair the failing code and re-execute the test class. Once that's done, you can move on to implementing the special character validation. Gotta walk before you can run, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tu

1 months ago

Haha, I like how the question is asking what to do 'next' when the test class has already failed. Looks like someone needs to brush up on their testing skills!

upvoted 0 times

Virgilio

10 days ago

Exactly, step by step to ensure our password validation is robust.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebeca

16 days ago

Once we fix that, we can move on to adding code for the special character validation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

18 days ago

Good idea, we need to make sure the 7 character password validation passes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

1 months ago

Let's repair the failing code and re-execute it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clare

2 months ago

Hold on, why would you develop a new test class for the special character validation? That's just adding more complexity. Focus on the problem at hand and fix the existing test class.

upvoted 0 times

Jerry

11 days ago

Adding more complexity with a new test class is not the solution right now.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tresa

13 days ago

We should repair the failing code and re-execute it for the test class.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

15 days ago

I agree, let's focus on fixing the existing test class first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Markus

3 months ago

Okay, so the issue is with the password length validation. We need to fix that first before moving on to the special character validation. Repair the failing code and re-execute the test class to make sure it passes.

upvoted 0 times