BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CT-AI Topic 6 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CT-AI exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 6
[All CT-AI Questions]

Pairwise testing can be used in the context of self-driving cars for controlling an explosion in the number of combinations of parameters.

Which ONE of the following options is LEAST likely to be a reason for this incredible growth of parameters?

SELECT ONE OPTION

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Pairwise testing is used to handle the large number of combinations of parameters that can arise in complex systems like self-driving cars. The question asks which of the given options is least likely to be a reason for the explosion in the number of parameters.

Different Road Types (A): Self-driving cars must operate on various road types, such as highways, city streets, rural roads, etc. Each road type can have different characteristics, requiring the car's system to adapt and handle different scenarios. Thus, this is a significant factor contributing to the growth of parameters.

Different Weather Conditions (B): Weather conditions such as rain, snow, fog, and bright sunlight significantly affect the performance of self-driving cars. The car's sensors and algorithms must adapt to these varying conditions, which adds to the number of parameters that need to be considered.

ML Model Metrics to Evaluate Functional Performance (C): While evaluating machine learning (ML) model performance is crucial, it does not directly contribute to the explosion of parameter combinations in the same way that road types, weather conditions, and car features do. Metrics are used to measure and assess performance but are not themselves variable conditions that the system must handle.

Different Features like ADAS, Lane Change Assistance, etc. (D): Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and other features add complexity to self-driving cars. Each feature can have multiple settings and operational modes, contributing to the overall number of parameters.

Hence, the least likely reason for the incredible growth in the number of parameters is C. ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance.


ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus Section 9.2 on Pairwise Testing discusses the application of this technique to manage the combinations of different variables in AI-based systems, including those used in self-driving cars.

Sample Exam Questions document, Question #29 provides context for the explosion in parameter combinations in self-driving cars and highlights the use of pairwise testing as a method to manage this complexity.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lottie
1 months ago
Haha, C) ML model metrics? Really? That's like saying the weather has no impact on your driving. Good one, guys. The correct answer is clearly B) Different weather conditions. That's the real wild card in this whole self-driving car thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
1 months ago
D) Different features like ADAS, Lane Change Assistance etc. is the least likely reason. Those features are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the complexity of self-driving car tech. I bet the developers wish they could just focus on the basics sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
Goldie
5 days ago
C) ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
6 days ago
B) Different weather conditions
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
14 days ago
A) Different Road Types
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Silva
1 months ago
I think different road types may be the least likely reason for the explosion in parameter combinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
1 months ago
I believe ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance could also be a reason for the growth of parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
I agree with Nguyet, the variety of features definitely contributes to the increase in parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
2 months ago
B) Different weather conditions seems like the obvious choice here. I mean, who would've thought rain, snow, and sunshine could make such a difference? The engineers must be pulling their hair out trying to account for it all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
2 months ago
Agreed, C is the weakest option here. The explosion in parameters is definitely driven by the need to account for all the real-world scenarios self-driving cars will encounter. Gotta test 'em all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
2 months ago
I'd say C) ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance is the least likely reason. The growth of parameters is more likely due to the sheer number of different road types, weather conditions, and vehicle features that need to be tested.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
20 days ago
D) Different features like ADAS, Lane Change Assistance etc.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
22 days ago
C) ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
23 days ago
B) Different weather conditions
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
1 months ago
A) Different Road Types
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nguyet
2 months ago
I think the incredible growth of parameters is due to different features like ADAS and Lane Change Assistance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel