Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISM Exam LEAD Topic 4 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISM's Leadership and Transformation in Supply Management exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 4
[All Leadership and Transformation in Supply Management Questions]

DEF, Inc. is a large global manufacturer. Two of DEF's supply managers, who are located in offices in different countries, are assigned to lead a new product development team. The team is to be comprised of two stakeholders from each of the supply managers' locations. The supply managers, as well as their respective departments, have had some friction between them in the past, and there is concern they will not be able to work together effectively on this project. Of the following, the BEST approach for assigning stakeholders to the team would be for the supply managers to

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Conflict Resolution: Given the history of friction between the supply managers and their departments, a collaborative approach is necessary to prevent further conflict and ensure effective teamwork.

Joint Decision Making: By creating a list of stakeholders from each location and making the selections together, the supply managers can ensure that the team is balanced and that all perspectives are considered. This collaborative approach fosters a sense of shared ownership and mutual respect.

Stakeholder Involvement: Involving both managers in the selection process ensures that the chosen stakeholders are acceptable to both parties, reducing the likelihood of bias and increasing the commitment of all team members.

Building Trust: Working together to select stakeholders can help build trust and improve the working relationship between the supply managers, setting a positive tone for the project.

Reference: This approach aligns with best practices in team building and conflict resolution as discussed in leadership and management literature, including works like 'The Five Dysfunctions of a Team' by Patrick Lencioni and guidelines from the Project Management Institute (PMI).


by Aleshia at Aug 04, 2024, 09:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium LEAD Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Gerald
1 months ago
I agree with Cassi, creating a list of stakeholders from each location and making the selections together would promote collaboration and understanding between the teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
1 months ago
I think asking senior management to intervene in making the stakeholder assignments would be the most effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe they should select stakeholders from their own locations to avoid any potential conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
1 months ago
I think the best approach would be for the supply managers to select stakeholders from each other's locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
2 months ago
Option B, really? That's just asking for more drama. Might as well light a match and throw it in the middle of the room. Option D is the only logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Chu
24 days ago
Exactly, Option D is the best way to ensure fairness and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
25 days ago
D) create a list of stakeholders from each location and make the selections together
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
27 days ago
B) select stakeholders from their own locations
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
1 months ago
A) select stakeholders from each other's locations
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adaline
2 months ago
I agree with Phillip, involving senior management would help in resolving any conflicts and ensuring a balanced team composition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
2 months ago
Haha, imagine if they let senior management get involved. Talk about a recipe for disaster! Option D is clearly the most mature and professional approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
2 months ago
I think asking senior management to intervene in making the stakeholder assignments would be the most effective approach to ensure fairness and impartiality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. Definitely don't want those managers picking their own people and causing more tension. Option D sounds like the smartest solution.
upvoted 0 times
Annalee
1 months ago
I think it's important for both sides to have a say in who is on the team to avoid any potential conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
1 months ago
Agreed, having both supply managers involved in selecting stakeholders from each location seems like the fairest way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mohammad
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe they should select stakeholders from each other's locations to promote collaboration and reduce friction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
2 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Collaborating on the stakeholder selections is the best way to foster teamwork and overcome past friction.
upvoted 0 times
Rory
1 months ago
I agree, working together to select stakeholders will help build trust and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
1 months ago
D) create a list of stakeholders from each location and make the selections together
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
1 months ago
B) select stakeholders from their own locations
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
2 months ago
D) create a list of stakeholders from each location and make the selections together
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
2 months ago
B) select stakeholders from their own locations
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
2 months ago
A) select stakeholders from each other's locations
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
2 months ago
A) select stakeholders from each other's locations
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merissa
2 months ago
I think the best approach would be for the supply managers to select stakeholders from their own locations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel