Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA Exam ECBA Topic 1 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's ECBA exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 1
[All ECBA Questions]

An atomic requirement:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A requirement can be of benefit to a stakeholder and still not be a desirable part of a solution. A requirement that does not deliver benefit to a stakeholder is a strong candidate for elimination. When requirements do not align, either the future state must be re-evaluated and the solution scope changed, or the requirement removed from the solution scope.


by Tyra at Feb 08, 2024, 10:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ECBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Eleni
6 days ago
I'd go with D). After all, what's the point of a requirement if it doesn't align with stakeholder needs? Gotta keep them happy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
12 days ago
B) seems like the most accurate description of an atomic requirement. It's concise and to the point, with no unnecessary fluff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
18 days ago
I believe it also needs to align with the identified needs of the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
19 days ago
I agree with Tori, it should contain no extraneous or unnecessary content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
21 days ago
I think an atomic requirement is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel