Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA Exam ECBA Topic 1 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's ECBA exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 1
[All ECBA Questions]

An atomic requirement:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A requirement can be of benefit to a stakeholder and still not be a desirable part of a solution. A requirement that does not deliver benefit to a stakeholder is a strong candidate for elimination. When requirements do not align, either the future state must be re-evaluated and the solution scope changed, or the requirement removed from the solution scope.


by Tyra at Feb 08, 2024, 10:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ECBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Stefania
2 months ago
Atomic, huh? I'm picturing little requirement atoms flying around, colliding and forming larger requirements. Somebody call the requirement particle accelerator!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
2 months ago
A) is a bit too broad, don't you think? An atomic requirement needs to be self-contained, not dependent on other things.
upvoted 0 times
Lucille
15 days ago
C) uses common terminology understood by the audience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
17 days ago
B) contains no extraneous or unnecessary content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
21 days ago
C) uses common terminology understood by the audience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
26 days ago
B) contains no extraneous or unnecessary content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
26 days ago
A) is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
27 days ago
A) is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
2 months ago
Hmm, C) is an interesting one. Using common terminology is key for clear communication, especially with non-technical stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
Rene
1 months ago
Definitely, it's important to speak the same language to avoid any misunderstandings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
1 months ago
I agree, it helps avoid confusion and ensures that the requirements are clearly understood by all parties involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
2 months ago
Yes, using common terminology is crucial for ensuring everyone is on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleni
2 months ago
I'd go with D). After all, what's the point of a requirement if it doesn't align with stakeholder needs? Gotta keep them happy!
upvoted 0 times
Isabella
1 months ago
That's true, each requirement should stand on its own to avoid confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 months ago
A) is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
2 months ago
Exactly! It's crucial to ensure the requirements meet the stakeholders' needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
2 months ago
D) aligns with the identified needs of the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashton
3 months ago
B) seems like the most accurate description of an atomic requirement. It's concise and to the point, with no unnecessary fluff.
upvoted 0 times
Carma
2 months ago
B) seems like the most accurate description of an atomic requirement. It's concise and to the point, with no unnecessary fluff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
2 months ago
A) is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ty
3 months ago
I believe it also needs to align with the identified needs of the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
3 months ago
I agree with Tori, it should contain no extraneous or unnecessary content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
3 months ago
I think an atomic requirement is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel