BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA Exam CBAP Topic 1 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 1
[All CBAP Questions]

A large insurance company wants to buy a new claims processing system or upgrade one of its two existing system. Each year the claims department is given a $3.5 million budget to spend. Time is of the essence since there are tome regulatory charges that will be coming the following year that will require several features that currently neither one of the two claims System currently support.

There are eight stakeholders onvolved in this initiative. There are local to where the claim system are managed, while five are located across the country. The business analyst (BA) struggled to get all stakeholders to agree on the desired features but ultimately got agreement on ten identified key features for the new claims system. The BA was able to build a current state and future state process model which included all ten key features.

System a processes 75% of the company's claims. It is 5 years old and the claim processors love it because it is easy to use. However it must go offline for two hours each day. The code is very module so it does have flexibility to be modified. To upgrade system A to have all ten features it would cost $5 million. System A would be at capacity if it were to process all of the company's claims.

System B process 25% of the company's claims. It is an older mainframe system, but rarely goes offline. It could easily handle double the number of claims that system A processes. However it has a lot of legacy code and would cost $6 million to upgrade.

Both system have some of the tem desired key features. But neither system has all ten. The cost to buy a new system would be $7 million.

Below is the estimated cost for each feature in priority order.

If the budget for the initiative was firm, what is a feasible solution to make sure the project stays within budget?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Denna
4 months ago
You know, it's almost like the insurance company is playing a game of 'Choose Your Own Adventure' with our money. Maybe they should just roll the dice and see what happens!
upvoted 0 times
Cristal
3 months ago
That could work, as long as those features are the most essential ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
3 months ago
Maybe they should buy the new system with only the first 5 features to stay within budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
3 months ago
But what if system A reaches capacity with all the company's claims?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
3 months ago
I think they should upgrade system A with the first 8 features.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leigha
4 months ago
Ah, the joys of bureaucracy. I bet the stakeholders are already plotting to sabotage each other's preferred options. May the best office politician win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
Option D is a bit of a letdown, don't you think? Settling for just the first 5 features? I mean, we're talking about a $7 million system here. Might as well go big or go home!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
Wait, what's this about System B? Upgrading that old mainframe system? That's like putting lipstick on a pig. I'd steer clear of that option if I were you.
upvoted 0 times
Matilda
2 months ago
I agree, System B might not be the best option. Let's focus on either buying the new system with the first 8 features or upgrading System A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
2 months ago
I see your point, but upgrading System A might be a more cost-effective solution in the long run. It's already loved by the claim processors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
3 months ago
System B may be old, but it can handle double the claims that System A processes. It might be worth considering upgrading it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
3 months ago
Portia: I think we should either buy the new system with the first 8 features or upgrade System A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
3 months ago
Yeah, it might end up costing more in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
4 months ago
I agree, upgrading System B seems like a risky move.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tegan
4 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. The new system might be a better long-term investment, even if we have to sacrifice a few features. Gotta think about the future, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Laurena
3 months ago
But we also have to make sure we stay within budget. Maybe upgrading system A with the first 8 features is the best compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
4 months ago
We need to consider the long-term benefits of investing in the new system.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Venita
4 months ago
Good point. Let's go with upgrading system A then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
4 months ago
Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Upgrading System A with the first 8 features seems like the best balance between budget and functionality.
upvoted 0 times
Rima
3 months ago
Or we could consider upgrading System B instead to spread out the claims processing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
3 months ago
That's a good point. Maybe we can look into optimizing the process to handle the increased load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
4 months ago
But what about the capacity issue if System A processes all of the company's claims?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
4 months ago
I agree, upgrading System A with the first 8 features makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonardo
4 months ago
That's true, but system A is already processing 75% of the claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
5 months ago
But upgrading system B with the first 8 features might be more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
5 months ago
I think we should upgrade system A with the first 8 features.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel