A newly appointed chief audit executive (CAE) of a small organization is developing a resource management plan. Which of the following approaches would be most beneficial to help the CAE obtain details of the internal audit activity's collective knowledge, skills, and other competencies?
Conducting a documented skills assessment helps in identifying the existing competencies and any gaps within the internal audit team.
Post-audit surveys can provide feedback on the performance and areas for improvement, which can be used to further refine the skills and competencies of the audit staff (Ref: [16source])
An engagement supervisor obtains facilities maintenance reports from a contractor during an audit of third-party services. Which of the following is the source of authority for the engagement supervisor to make such contact outside the organization?
Authority Source: The internal audit charter is a formal document that defines the internal audit activity's purpose, authority, and responsibility. It grants internal auditors the right to access all records, personnel, and physical properties relevant to the performance of engagements.
Facilities Maintenance Reports: When an engagement supervisor contacts a third-party contractor for maintenance reports, the authority is derived from the internal audit charter, which ensures auditors have the necessary access to perform their duties.
Importance of the Charter: This ensures the independence and objectivity of the internal audit activity, providing a clear mandate for auditors to obtain information from external parties as needed.
Which of the following is the most appropriate way to ensure that a newly formed internal audit activity remains free from undue influence by management?
The internal audit charter is a formal document that defines the internal audit activity's purpose, authority, and responsibility.
Establishing the internal audit activity's position within the organization in an audit charter ensures independence and objectivity by clearly stating the internal audit's role and its reporting lines.
The charter should be approved by the board and senior management to reinforce its authority and protect the internal audit activity from undue influence by management
According to IIA guidance, which of the following most appropriately justifies the CEO's decision that the internal audit activity shall be responsible for risk management and Investigation at multinational organization?
Role of Internal Audit Charter: The internal audit charter is a formal document that defines the purpose, authority, and responsibility of the internal audit activity. It establishes the internal audit activity's position within the organization, including the nature of the chief audit executive's functional reporting relationship with the board.
CEO's Decision Justification: According to IIA guidance, the internal audit activity can take on responsibilities related to risk management and investigation if it is defined within the internal audit charter. The charter must outline the scope of the internal audit activity, which can include risk management functions if approved by the board and senior management.
Authority and Proficiency: While the CEO has the authority to assign responsibilities, the decision must align with the provisions of the internal audit charter. The level of proficiency of the CAE and the recommendation of external auditors can support the decision but are not primary justifications.
IIA Standards: Standard 1000 -- Purpose, Authority, and Responsibility -- requires that the internal audit activity's purpose, authority, and responsibility be formally defined in an internal audit charter, consistent with the Mission of Internal Audit and the mandatory elements of the International Professional Practices Framework.
Reference:
The internal audit charter is the primary document that justifies the scope and responsibilities of the internal audit activity, including risk management and investigation roles. It ensures that such roles are formally acknowledged and authorized by the board and senior management.
While auditing an organization's credit approval process, an internal auditor learns that the organization has made a large loan to another auditors relative. Which course of action should the auditor take?
Identify the Conflict of Interest: The internal auditor learns about a large loan made to another auditor's relative, which represents a conflict of interest.
Refer to Professional Standards: According to the Institute of Internal Auditors' (IIA) standards, an internal auditor must maintain objectivity and avoid conflicts of interest (IIA Standard 1100 -- Independence and Objectivity).
Escalate the Issue: The appropriate course of action is to escalate this matter to the chief audit executive (CAE) and management, as they are responsible for determining the impact of the conflict and the appropriate response.
Decision Making: The CAE and management will assess whether the conflict of interest could impair the auditor's objectivity and decide whether the auditor should be removed from the engagement or if additional oversight is needed.
Documentation: It is important to document the conflict and the decision-making process in the audit documentation for transparency and accountability.
The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, specifically Standard 1100 on Independence and Objectivity.
Natalya
24 days agoMy
2 months agoAlverta
3 months agoDaron
3 months agoScarlet
4 months agoRodolfo
4 months agoMargurite
4 months agoDesirae
5 months agoShalon
5 months agoRicki
5 months agoColetta
6 months agoWilda
6 months agoChuck
6 months agoGenevieve
7 months agoMerlyn
7 months agoLajuana
7 months agoClay
7 months agoLashunda
7 months agoCandra
8 months agoCharlette
10 months ago