BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-CRMA Topic 8 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-CRMA exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 8
[All IIA-CRMA Questions]

While auditing an organization's credit approval process, an internal auditor learns that the organization has made a large loan to another auditor's relative. Which course of action should the auditor take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rachael
4 months ago
It's best for the management to make that decision, considering potential conflicts of interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
5 months ago
So, should we not withdraw from the audit engagement?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
5 months ago
I agree with Lyla, they can determine whether the audit engagement should continue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
5 months ago
I believe the best course of action would be to have the chief audit executive and management decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
5 months ago
But wouldn't that create a conflict of interest?
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
6 months ago
I think we should disclose the relative's information in the final communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
6 months ago
Having the chief audit executive and management make the decision seems like the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
6 months ago
I believe that withdrawing immediately could harm the organization's reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
6 months ago
But wouldn't withdrawing from the audit engagement be the most ethical option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
6 months ago
I agree, transparency is important in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
6 months ago
I think the auditor should disclose in the engagement final communication that the relative is a customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
7 months ago
Ooh, this is a tough one. I mean, on one hand, you don't want to jeopardize the whole audit just because of a relative. But on the other hand, you can't just ignore it. I think the auditor should definitely disclose it, but maybe they can find a way to still do the audit without compromising their integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
7 months ago
You know, I can see the argument for immediately withdrawing from the audit engagement. That would be the safest option to maintain independence and avoid any appearance of bias. But I can also understand the desire to have management weigh in on it first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
7 months ago
Yeah, I'm with you on that. Transparency is key here. The auditor needs to be upfront about the potential conflict of interest. Hiding it would just make things worse in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Proceeding with the audit and not including the relative's information doesn't seem right to me. That would be a breach of ethical standards. I think the auditor should disclose the relative's involvement in the final communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
7 months ago
I agree, this is a tough one. I think the best course of action would be to have the chief audit executive and management determine whether the auditor should continue with the audit engagement. That way, they can assess the potential conflict of interest and make an informed decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
7 months ago
Wow, this is a tricky situation. The auditor's relative being a customer of the organization being audited definitely raises some ethical concerns. We need to be very careful here to maintain objectivity and independence.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
6 months ago
I agree. Transparency is key in situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
6 months ago
That's a good point. It's important to be transparent about any potential conflicts of interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
6 months ago
I think the auditor should disclose in the engagement final communication that the relative is a customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel