BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-CIA-Part2 Topic 8 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-CIA-Part2 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 8
[All IIA-CIA-Part2 Questions]

Which of the following is an advantage of nonstatistical sampling over statistical sampling?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hyman
1 months ago
I heard that some auditors use a magic 8-ball to determine their sample size. Now that's what I call nonstatistical sampling!
upvoted 0 times
Irma
4 days ago
I agree, using subjective judgment seems more practical in audit situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
6 days ago
I highly doubt that a magic 8-ball would be a reliable method for determining sample size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
12 days ago
That's hilarious! I wonder if it actually works.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justa
1 months ago
But doesn't statistical sampling provide more objective recommendations for management?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
2 months ago
I agree, it's great that auditors can use their professional judgment in selecting items to be tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
2 months ago
Hmm, this question is a piece of cake. C is clearly the correct answer. After all, who needs statistics when you have good old-fashioned auditor's intuition?
upvoted 0 times
Margarita
21 days ago
It's true, sometimes relying on statistical methods may not be practical, so nonstatistical sampling can be advantageous in certain audit situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
22 days ago
Definitely, nonstatistical sampling gives auditors more flexibility to tailor the sample size based on their professional judgment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 months ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. Nonstatistical sampling allows for subjective judgment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Haydee
2 months ago
I like the flexibility of nonstatistical sampling. It lets me pick the sample size that works best for my audit, not some rigid formula. C is definitely the answer.
upvoted 0 times
Noel
18 days ago
Definitely, C is the correct answer. Nonstatistical sampling provides for the use of subjective judgment in determining the sample size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
23 days ago
It's nice to have the ability to tailor the sample size to the specific circumstances of the audit engagement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
28 days ago
I agree, nonstatistical sampling allows for subjective judgment in determining the sample size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
1 months ago
I like the flexibility of nonstatistical sampling. It lets me pick the sample size that works best for my audit, not some rigid formula.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregoria
2 months ago
I think nonstatistical sampling allows for more flexibility in determining the sample size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
2 months ago
Nonstatistical sampling allows me to use my professional judgment, which is way better than relying on those boring statistical methods. C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Renea
1 months ago
Yeah, it gives us more flexibility to tailor the sampling to the specific circumstances of the audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
2 months ago
I agree, using professional judgment in determining the sample size is definitely an advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel