Option A, of course! The internal auditor has to review past audits to make sure they're not reinventing the wheel. It's like reading the instruction manual before assembLindy the furniture.
I'm still trying to figure out what 'design evaluation' means. Sounds like a fancy term for auditing, but I'll go with option B. Segregation of duties is always a big deal.
Option D? Really? Communicating the audit results is important, but it's not part of the design evaluation phase. These options are a bit of a mixed bag.
The internal auditor reviewing prior audits and workpapers seems like the logical choice here. It's all about evaluating the design of the process, not the actual implementation.
Deandrea
1 months agoLindy
1 months agoMargart
19 days agoKassandra
24 days agoNickie
1 months agoKate
16 days agoRoxane
21 days agoDorothy
22 days agoHerman
2 months agoNicholle
2 months agoEladia
2 months agoAlethea
1 months agoNada
1 months agoIvory
2 months agoRoxanne
2 months agoElden
2 months agoVivan
2 months agoCarlton
1 months agoEileen
1 months agoRodolfo
1 months agoJosefa
2 months agoLinette
2 months agoNgoc
2 months agoAretha
2 months agoKarl
2 months ago