Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-CIA-Part1 Topic 10 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-CIA-Part1 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 10
[All IIA-CIA-Part1 Questions]

Which of the following circumstances would most likely be considered a potential red flag for fraud by the internal audit activity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

An increase in nonroutine journal entries is a classic red flag for potential fraud, as such entries may be used to adjust financials inappropriately. IIA guidance identifies unusual patterns in financial transactions as significant indicators of potential fraud risks.


Contribute your Thoughts:

King
2 months ago
B all the way! Nonroutine journal entries? That's like a highway sign for fraud, flashing 'COME TAKE A LOOK HERE!'
upvoted 0 times
Ryan
7 days ago
D) The recent employee survey indicates that some employees remain unaware of the organization's whistleblower hotline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
12 days ago
C) The database of approved suppliers has not been reviewed in the last year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
24 days ago
B) The volume of nonroutine journal entries has steadily increased over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
27 days ago
A) The monthly payroll reports are not vetted to ensure terminated employees have been removed from the payroll system.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
2 months ago
I think option D is a red flag too, lack of awareness of whistleblower hotline can lead to unreported fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 months ago
D sounds a bit like a trick question. Even if employees don't know about the whistleblower hotline, that doesn't necessarily mean fraud is happening. Still, it's a good idea to promote that hotline more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with C. An outdated approved supplier database could mean shady deals with unapproved vendors. Better keep an eye on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
2 months ago
I'd say A is the most concerning. Allowing terminated employees to remain on the payroll is just asking for trouble. That's a major vulnerability that needs to be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
22 days ago
D) The recent employee survey indicates that some employees remain unaware of the organization's whistleblower hotline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
25 days ago
C) The database of approved suppliers has not been reviewed in the last year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 months ago
B) The volume of nonroutine journal entries has steadily increased over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
1 months ago
A) The monthly payroll reports are not vetted to ensure terminated employees have been removed from the payroll system.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teresita
2 months ago
I believe option A is also important, ensuring terminated employees are removed from payroll is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
2 months ago
I agree with Jettie, increasing nonroutine journal entries could indicate manipulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
2 months ago
Definitely B. The increase in nonroutine journal entries is a classic sign of potential fraud. It's a red flag that needs to be investigated thoroughly.
upvoted 0 times
Buck
1 months ago
C) We should definitely look into this further to ensure everything is above board.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
2 months ago
B) I agree, that does seem like a red flag for potential fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
2 months ago
B) I agree, that does seem like a red flag for potential fraud. It's important to look into it further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
2 months ago
A) The volume of nonroutine journal entries has steadily increased over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
A) The volume of nonroutine journal entries has steadily increased over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jettie
2 months ago
I think option B is a red flag for fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel