Ah, the age-old debate of mandatory versus recommended. I think option D is incorrect - follow-up to ensure improvements are implemented should be a mandatory part of internal assessments, not just a recommendation.
Option C seems a bit sketchy to me. How can an internal auditor review their colleague's workpapers if they weren't involved in the audit? That doesn't sound like an independent review to me.
I'm not sure about that. Doesn't the IIA guidance say that internal assessments are conducted to improve the internal audit activity's performance, not just to benchmark it against industry best practices? I think option A is incorrect.
I think option B is the correct answer. The IIA guidance clearly states that internal assessments must be performed at least once every five years by a qualified assessor.
Dino
2 months agoSamira
18 days agoErasmo
1 months agoLeslie
1 months agoWhitley
2 months agoDana
2 months agoCassandra
2 months agoLeslie
2 months agoLeigha
2 months agoFranchesca
2 months agoLindsey
2 months agoMary
3 months agoWhitley
3 months agoRutha
3 months agoJesusa
3 months agoStephanie
1 months agoLeonie
1 months agoTalia
2 months agoVirgina
2 months agoMarguerita
3 months agoRutha
3 months ago