Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C1000-162 Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-162 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 3
[All C1000-162 Questions]

What is the effect of toggling the Global/Local option to Global in a Custom Rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Karl at Jun 21, 2024, 06:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-162 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Alyce
29 days ago
I'm picturing the central processor as this all-knowing, all-powerful entity, detecting custom rules like a security camera watching over the entire system. Option C gets my vote!
upvoted 0 times
Vanna
21 hours ago
C) It allows rules to be tracked by the central processor for detection by any Event Processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
5 days ago
A) It allows a rule to compare events & flows in real time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barbra
30 days ago
Personally, I'm going with C. It's the most comprehensive answer that aligns with the description of the Global/Local option. Plus, it has a nice ring to it - 'central processor for detection'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
1 months ago
I don't know, option A seems a bit too good to be true. Real-time event and flow comparison? That's just showing off, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
2 days ago
User 3: I think we should test it out to see if it really works as described.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
4 days ago
User 2: Maybe it's just a fancy way of saying something simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
9 days ago
User 1: I agree, option A does sound too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
12 days ago
User 3: Yeah, it could be a bit exaggerated for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
15 days ago
User 2: Maybe it's just a fancy way of saying something simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
25 days ago
User 1: I agree, option A does sound a bit too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nieves
1 months ago
I think it allows a rule to inject new events back into the pipeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Analyzing the geographic location of the event source or allowing the central processor to detect the rule could both be valid effects of toggling the Global/Local option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
1 months ago
D sounds like the right choice to me. Being able to inject new events back into the pipeline to affect other incoming events is a powerful feature of a Custom Rule in global mode.
upvoted 0 times
Diego
25 days ago
User2: Yes, that feature is really powerful in global mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
1 months ago
User1: I think D is the correct choice, it allows a rule to inject new events back into the pipeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hector
1 months ago
That makes sense, it would help with real-time analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Toggling the Global/Local option to Global allows rules to be tracked by the central processor, which is crucial for event detection across the entire system.
upvoted 0 times
Elmer
1 months ago
C) It allows rules to be tracked by the central processor for detection by any Event Processor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
2 months ago
A) It allows a rule to compare events & flows in real time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
2 months ago
I believe it allows a rule to compare events & flows in real time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
2 months ago
I think toggling to Global allows rules to be tracked by the central processor.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel