Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C1000-147 Topic 10 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-147 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 10
[All C1000-147 Questions]

When deploying API Connect on an OpenShift cluster, what are the minimum number of nodes required for high availability for the platform?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Leonor at Sep 17, 2024, 09:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-147 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Skye
4 months ago
Haha, if I had a dollar for every time a question asked for the 'minimum' and the answer involved 'maximum' nodes, I'd be a rich man! Option C looks like the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Jonelle
2 months ago
Definitely, it's important to pay attention to those details when deploying on OpenShift.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
2 months ago
It's always tricky when they ask for minimum but the answer involves more nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
3 months ago
Yeah, having 1 Master Node and 3 Worker Nodes should provide a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
3 months ago
I agree, option C seems to be the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused. Isn't the answer supposed to be the minimum number of nodes required for high availability? I'm not sure if 3 master nodes and 3 worker nodes qualify as the minimum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
4 months ago
I would go with option D. 3 master nodes and 3 worker nodes sounds like the most robust and fault-tolerant setup for a production-ready API Connect deployment.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but having more nodes does seem like a safer bet for avoiding single points of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
3 months ago
I agree, having 3 master nodes and 3 worker nodes definitely adds more redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
3 months ago
I think option A with 2 master nodes and 2 worker nodes could also work well for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) 3 Master Nodes and 3 Worker Nodes could also be a valid option for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
4 months ago
Option A seems to be the most reasonable choice for high availability. 2 master nodes for redundancy and 2 worker nodes to handle the workload.
upvoted 0 times
Junita
3 months ago
Definitely, having a minimum of 2 master nodes is crucial for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
3 months ago
That makes sense, it's important to have backup nodes in case of failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
3 months ago
I agree, having 2 master nodes and 2 worker nodes provides redundancy and workload distribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
4 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
4 months ago
I agree with Alonso, having 2 Master Nodes and 2 Worker Nodes provides high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
4 months ago
I think the answer is A) 2 Master Nodes and 2 Worker Nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel