IBM Exam C1000-140 Topic 6 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-140 exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 6

A deployment professional is about to add a secondary appliance to a QRadar high availability deployment. It is confirmed that both the primary and the secondary appliances are on the same QRadar version. However, the hardware configuration of both appliances is different.

What must be confirmed before adding the secondary appliance to the high availability deployment?

AThe combined size of the /store and /transient partitions on the primary host must be larger than the /store partition on the secondary host.

BThe secondary host must use a different management interface than the primary HA host.

CThe primary host must contain more physical interfaces than the secondary.

DThe combined size of the /store and /transient partitions on the secondary host must be equal to or larger than the /store partition on the primary host.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Jamal at Jul 03, 2024, 05:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-140 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Latia

3 months ago

Ah, the age-old question: how many partitions does it take to screw in a high availability deployment? The answer, of course, is D - the one that makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

4 months ago

Is the answer really that obvious? It's gotta be C. The primary host needs more interfaces to handle the additional traffic.

upvoted 0 times

Harris

3 months ago

No, I'm pretty sure it's A. The combined size of the partitions on the primary host must be larger than the secondary host's /store partition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

3 months ago

I think it's actually D. The size of the partitions on the secondary host needs to be equal or larger than the primary host.

upvoted 0 times

...

4 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is D. The secondary host's storage capacity needs to be at least as large as the primary's to handle the workload.

upvoted 0 times

Earlean

4 months ago

Agreed, it's important for the secondary host to handle the workload.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rex

4 months ago

I think the answer is D too. The storage capacity needs to match.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tambra

5 months ago

I'm not sure about the physical interfaces, but I think we should focus on the partition sizes as mentioned in option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paola

5 months ago

I agree with Edgar. Option A seems to be the correct answer because the primary host must have larger combined partitions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edgar

5 months ago

I think we need to confirm the size of the /store and /transient partitions on both hosts.

upvoted 0 times

...