Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C1000-136 Topic 5 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-136 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 5
[All C1000-136 Questions]

In the default configuration, where are IBM Cloud Pak for Data user accounts stored?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Felicidad at Apr 10, 2024, 08:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-136 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mona
10 months ago
I see, thanks for sharing your insights. I'll consider that when choosing my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
10 months ago
I also agree with Amber. Having multiple storage options can be beneficial for different use cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
10 months ago
Sure, Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage offers versatility in storage options, making it a valuable choice for IBM Cloud Pak for Data deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
10 months ago
Hmm, that's an interesting point. Can you explain why you think that is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage can be deployed as block, file, and object storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) IBM Cloud File Storage can be attached to any IBM Cloud Pak for Data deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
11 months ago
I believe Portworx could be a cost-effective option as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
11 months ago
That's a valid point, IBM Cloud File Storage does offer flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
11 months ago
I'm not sure. I think IBM Cloud File Storage can also be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
11 months ago
I agree with Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage seems to be the most versatile option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
12 months ago
I think the answer is D) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage can be deployed as block, file, and object storage.
upvoted 0 times
Lavonna
11 months ago
I think you're right. It sounds like the most versatile option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
11 months ago
I believe the answer is D) Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage can be deployed as block, file, and object storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlee
1 years ago
Hold up, are we sure about that? I thought NFS storage was the default option that gets configured automatically with IBM Cloud Pak for Data. I'm leaning more towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
1 years ago
Ah, I remember now! IBM Cloud File Storage can definitely be attached to IBM Cloud Pak for Data deployments. So I think option A is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
1 years ago
I agree with Youlanda. Option D seems to be the most complete answer. The other options only cover one or two storage types, while D mentions all three: block, file, and object storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
1 years ago
Option D sounds like the most comprehensive answer to me. Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage can handle different types of storage, which aligns with the question asking about 'supported shared storage types'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
1 years ago
Hmm, I think I know the answer to this one. Portworx is a separate product that requires a license, so option C is definitely not correct. The others seem plausible, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
1 years ago
This question seems pretty straightforward, but I'm not sure if I fully understand the different storage options and how they work with IBM Cloud Pak for Data. I'll need to review the documentation again to make sure I have a solid understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel