Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C1000-133 Topic 3 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-133 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 3
[All C1000-133 Questions]

Which of the following is NOT an advantage of implementing the Promising Server?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Salome at Jul 05, 2024, 11:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-133 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Hillary
5 months ago
Haha, D is definitely the odd one out here. Sharing inventory across enterprises? What is this, some sort of communist utopia? I'll stick with option C, thanks!
upvoted 0 times
Nadine
5 months ago
Yeah, sharing inventory across enterprises does seem a bit far-fetched. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I agree, D does sound a bit too idealistic. Option C seems more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashaunda
5 months ago
I'm going with B. Businesses coordinating multiple servers for inventory and promising? That's just overkill, if you ask me. Keep it simple, I say!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
6 months ago
Hmm, I'd say option A is the one that's not an advantage. Multiple order servers accessing the same Promising Server? That just sounds like a recipe for chaos and confusion.
upvoted 0 times
Wynell
4 months ago
Yeah, having inventory and promising housed in one system for all participant channels and organizations seems like a great benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
5 months ago
I think option B makes more sense, businesses coordinating multiple servers for inventory and promising sounds like a useful advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
5 months ago
I agree, having multiple order servers accessing the same Promising Server does seem like it could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
6 months ago
I agree with Willard, D seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
6 months ago
But D makes sense because it mentions sharing inventory across different nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
6 months ago
No, I believe it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
6 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
6 months ago
D? Really? That's the correct answer? Sharing inventory across enterprises and nodes from different colonies? That sounds like a security nightmare waiting to happen!
upvoted 0 times
Dorothea
5 months ago
True, it's a trade-off between efficiency and security. It's important to have proper protocols in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
5 months ago
Yes, D is the correct answer. It does sound risky, but it can also improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
5 months ago
C) Inventory and promising is housed in one system for all participant channels and organizations
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
6 months ago
B) Businesses are allowed to coordinate multiple servers for inventory and promising
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
6 months ago
A) Multiple order servers can access the same Promising Server
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel