Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C1000-130 Topic 7 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-130 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 7
[All C1000-130 Questions]

What is the outcome when the API Connect operator is installed at the cluster scope?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Freeman at Sep 18, 2024, 09:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-130 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Delbert
4 months ago
Automatic updates restricted by the approval strategy? Sounds like a real party pooper to me. I'm going with B.
upvoted 0 times
Chaya
3 months ago
User1: Well, I guess we'll have to wait and see which one is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
3 months ago
User3: I agree with User2. A sounds like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
3 months ago
User2: I'm not sure about that. I'll go with A. Automatic updates will be restricted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
4 months ago
User1: I think it's D. The entire cluster behaves as one large tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Donte
5 months ago
Wait, what? The entire cluster as one tenant? That's like putting all your eggs in one basket. I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
4 months ago
Yeah, I don't think I would want to go with the option of having the entire cluster act as one large tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
4 months ago
I think I would prefer to have more control over updates with the approval strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
4 months ago
I agree, it does seem risky to have the entire cluster behave as one tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rashad
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll go with C just to be safe. Who knows, the operator might install in a production deployment profile.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
4 months ago
I'll stick with C. The operator might install in a production deployment profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
4 months ago
I agree with User1. D seems to make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
5 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I'll go with A. Automatic updates will be restricted by the approval strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
5 months ago
I think D is the correct answer. The entire cluster behaves as one large tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frederica
5 months ago
But doesn't it also mean that API Connect services will be deployed in the default namespace?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
5 months ago
B sounds good to me. It makes sense that the API Connect services would be deployed in the default namespace.
upvoted 0 times
Marsha
5 months ago
I think D is the correct answer. The entire cluster effectively behaves as one large tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
5 months ago
I agree with Marnie. D seems like the most logical outcome when the API Connect operator is installed at the cluster scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
5 months ago
B sounds good to me. It makes sense that the API Connect services would be deployed in the default namespace.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marlon
5 months ago
I agree with Rory. The API Connect operator at cluster scope makes the cluster act as one tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
5 months ago
I think the outcome is that the entire cluster behaves as one large tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
5 months ago
I think the answer is D. The entire cluster behaving as one large tenant makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Kallie
4 months ago
It also helps in ensuring consistent policies and configurations throughout the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
4 months ago
That's true, it allows for better resource utilization across the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
4 months ago
I agree, having the entire cluster behave as one large tenant simplifies management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
4 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel