IBM Exam C1000-118 Topic 4 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-118 exam

Question #: 42
Topic #: 4

The customer decided to remove the Caveonix RiskForesight all-in-one service from the IBM Cloud and move to a distributed model for VMware Solutions. By default, IBM automatically deletes only the single deployed all-in-one Caveonix VM and the dedicated private subnet that was ordered for it.What are the key considerations? (Select Two)

AIf you used the IP addresses of the dedicated private subnet on additional VMs, those VMs must be ^ assigned new IP addresses to continue to function

BOld configurations can be deleted and migrated to a new environment

CIf you scaled out the Caveonix VM into multiple VMs, those additional VMs are not removed

DDelete the VM and Storage allocation, Cavenoix RiskForesight will discontinue data gathering and services are deemed stopped

EUnsubscribe the license and remove the instance of all-in-one deployment in the VMware solutions, release the IP address to DHCP, DNS servers

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C

by Deandrea at Apr 12, 2024, 05:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-118 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Barb

10 months ago

Yes, that's a good point. We shouldn't forget about scaling out the Caveonix VM

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlena

10 months ago

I believe option C) is also important, as additional VMs need to be considered

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaitlyn

10 months ago

I agree with we need to assign new IP addresses and delete the VM and Storage allocation

upvoted 0 times

...

Barb

10 months ago

I think the key considerations are A) and D)

upvoted 0 times

...

Delfina

10 months ago

It's crucial to take these considerations into account before making the switch to a distributed model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salena

11 months ago

I also think D) is important. If we delete the VM and storage allocation, the services will stop.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tabetha

11 months ago

I agree with you, Delfina. If the IP addresses were used on additional VMs, they must be reassigned to continue functioning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delfina

12 months ago

I think the key considerations are A) and D)

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeff

1 years ago

Haha, tell me about it. I bet the IBM engineers who designed this exam question had a good laugh at our expense. 'Let's see if they can figure out all the implications of this migration!'

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeannetta

1 years ago

That's a good question. I suppose it depends on how complex the configurations are and whether they can be easily migrated. It could be a real headache if they're not.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaleesa

1 years ago

I agree, A and C seem like the most relevant options. But I'm also curious about B - what do you all think about deleting and migrating the old configurations?

upvoted 0 times

Corrinne

11 months ago

User 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

11 months ago

User 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Zita

11 months ago

User 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Toi

1 years ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards A and C as the correct answers. It's important to make sure those additional VMs get new IP addresses, and the scaling out of the Caveonix VM is a good point to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Almeta

1 years ago

Yeah, me neither. I think the key is to really understand what's happening with the IP addresses and the additional VMs. We don't want to accidentally break anything in the migration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olga

1 years ago

Wow, this question is really tricky! I'm not sure I fully understand all the implications of moving from the Caveonix all-in-one service to a distributed model.

upvoted 0 times

...