BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
IBM Discussions
Exam C1000-065 Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion
IBM Exam C1000-065 Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion
Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-065 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 1
[All C1000-065 Questions]
When developing a report, which two should be defined for a JOIN query?
A
a reference to two queries
B
only cached results
C
an expression editor
D
an intersection of two queries
E
a relationship defining cardinality
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A, D
by
Francine
at
Sep 13, 2024, 04:15 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium C1000-065 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Jody
17 days ago
I'm just going to go ahead and say E. Anything else would be like trying to bake a cake without a recipe.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mona
18 days ago
The answer has to be E. If you don't have the relationship defined, how is the database supposed to know how to combine the data?
upvoted
0
times
Lili
3 days ago
I think the answer is E, you need to define the relationship for a JOIN query.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Phillip
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be C) an expression editor.
upvoted
0
times
...
Glendora
1 months ago
I agree with Linette, defining cardinality is crucial for a JOIN query.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ellsworth
1 months ago
E is the obvious choice here. Without defining the cardinality, your JOIN query is just going to be a hot mess.
upvoted
0
times
...
Linette
1 months ago
I think the answer is E) a relationship defining cardinality.
upvoted
0
times
...
Berry
1 months ago
Haha, I almost went with D - an intersection of two queries. That would be a completely different type of operation! E is the way to go.
upvoted
0
times
Mireya
20 hours ago
E is crucial for determining the relationship cardinality in a JOIN query.
upvoted
0
times
...
Jacklyn
3 days ago
D would have been a mistake, E is the right option for defining a JOIN query.
upvoted
0
times
...
Cyndy
10 days ago
Definitely, E is essential for establishing the relationship cardinality in a JOIN query.
upvoted
0
times
...
Jeannine
25 days ago
I agree, E is the correct choice for defining a JOIN query.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Ronna
2 months ago
Definitely E. Defining the cardinality of the relationship between the tables is essential for a JOIN to function correctly.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rolland
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is E. A relationship defining cardinality is crucial for a JOIN query to work properly.
upvoted
0
times
Alesia
23 days ago
Let's go with E then.
upvoted
0
times
...
Darnell
25 days ago
No, it's definitely E. Cardinality is key for JOIN queries.
upvoted
0
times
...
Edna
26 days ago
I think it's either A or E.
upvoted
0
times
...
Hillary
1 months ago
I agree, E is the correct answer.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Jody
17 days agoMona
18 days agoLili
3 days agoPhillip
1 months agoGlendora
1 months agoEllsworth
1 months agoLinette
1 months agoBerry
1 months agoMireya
20 hours agoJacklyn
3 days agoCyndy
10 days agoJeannine
25 days agoRonna
2 months agoRolland
2 months agoAlesia
23 days agoDarnell
25 days agoEdna
26 days agoHillary
1 months ago