Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP CIPP/US Exam - Topic 8 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/US exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 8
[All CIPP/US Questions]

A financial services company install "bossware" software on its employees' remote computers to monitor performance. The software logs screenshots, mouse movements, and keystrokes to determine whether an employee is being productive. The software can also enable the computer webcams to record video footage.

Which of the following would best support an employee claim for an intrusion upon seclusion tort?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

If the camera begins recording whenever the computer is turned on, that creates a strong argument that the employer is impinging upon the the employee's right to privacy outside of work hours and in a private setting.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vanda
4 months ago
Biometric templates are concerning too, but A feels worse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
4 months ago
Totally agree with A, that’s just wrong!
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
4 months ago
Really? I’m not sure that’s enough for a legal claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
4 months ago
Definitely option A! That’s crossing the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
4 months ago
Wow, enabling the webcam all the time? That's a huge invasion of privacy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the biometric template in option B. Does that really count as intrusion, or is it more about tracking productivity?
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
5 months ago
I feel like I've seen a similar question before, and I think it was about monitoring personal activities. Option D could be relevant since it involves personal business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
5 months ago
I think option A might be the strongest because recording video whenever the computer is on seems like a huge invasion of privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
5 months ago
I remember discussing how constant surveillance could lead to claims of intrusion upon seclusion, but I'm not sure which option fits best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. All of these monitoring practices seem pretty invasive to me. How do I determine which one is the "best" for the legal claim? I'll have to re-read the question carefully and think through the implications of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The webcam recording video anytime the computer is on seems like the biggest invasion of privacy. That's a lot of constant surveillance, even in private settings. I think that would be the best option to support the intrusion claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. The company is clearly monitoring employees pretty extensively, but I'm not sure which specific practice would be the strongest basis for a legal claim. I'll have to think through the nuances of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward - we need to identify which of the monitoring practices would best support an employee's claim for intrusion upon seclusion. I'll carefully review each option and think about the level of privacy invasion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
5 months ago
Ah, I remember this from the lectures. The database needs to be in MOUNT state for operations that involve modifying the control files, like renaming or re-creating them. That's an important detail to remember for the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to recognize that "preteen" refers to ages 10-12, and "teen" refers to ages 13-19. So the answer should be based on the frequency counts for those age ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A. Firewalls are primarily focused on access control and blocking threats, not actively monitoring for anomalies. The NIDS, HIDS, and antivirus scanner are all designed to detect suspicious behavior, so the firewall is the only one that can't proactively detect anomalies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
6 months ago
I remember we practiced calculating estate taxes with similar numbers, but I'm a bit unsure about the marital deduction impact here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct statement about cost-volume-profit analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Does "bind the partnership" mean the partnership has to be legally responsible for the transaction? If so, I'd guess that hiring employees or signing advertising contracts wouldn't require full partner approval, so I'll eliminate B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 years ago
I agree with Corazon. Using the company's webcam to spy on employees outside of work is definitely crossing the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
2 years ago
I think option D would be the strongest. Recording video of personal activity is a clear invasion of privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
2 years ago
I wonder which option would be the best support for an intrusion upon seclusion tort claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
2 years ago
Yeah, it's definitely invasive. I feel like my privacy is being violated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
2 years ago
I can't believe the company is monitoring us like this.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel