IAPP Exam CIPP-US Topic 3 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-US exam

Question #: 62
Topic #: 3

SuperMart is a large Nevada-based business that has recently determined it sells what constitutes ''covered information'' under Nevada's privacy law, Senate Bill 260. Which of the following privacy compliance steps would best help SuperMart comply with the law?

AProviding a mechanism for consumers to opt out of sales.

BImplementing internal protocols for handling access and deletion requests.

CPreparing a notice of financial incentive for any loyalty programs offered to its customers.

DReviewing its vendor contracts to ensure that the vendors are subject to service provider restrictions.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

SB 260 relates to consumer ability to opt-out of PII sales by data brokers. https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/NELIS/REL/81st2021/Bill/7805/Text

by Chandra at Aug 07, 2024, 06:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIPP-US Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Katina

2 months ago

I see the value in both options A and B, but I think option D) Reviewing vendor contracts is also essential to ensure compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

2 months ago

I think option B) Implementing internal protocols for handling access and deletion requests is crucial as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arminda

2 months ago

I agree with Rodolfo, giving consumers the choice to opt out is important for privacy compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodolfo

2 months ago

I think option A) Providing a mechanism for consumers to opt out of sales would be the best step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merrilee

2 months ago

I see where Theodora is coming from. Having protocols in place for handling requests shows that SuperMart takes privacy seriously.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theodora

3 months ago

I believe option B) Implementing internal protocols for handling access and deletion requests is also important for compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

3 months ago

Haha, I bet SuperMart wishes they could just opt-out of this whole privacy law thing. But A is the way to go, for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

3 months ago

I'm torn between B and D, but I think B is the safer choice. Handling access and deletion requests properly is essential.

upvoted 0 times

Nida

1 months ago

True, both are important steps to take for privacy compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

1 months ago

But D is also important. Reviewing vendor contracts can ensure they comply with service provider restrictions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

2 months ago

I agree, having internal protocols in place for those requests is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marya

2 months ago

I think B is the way to go. Handling access and deletion requests is crucial for compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawana

3 months ago

C looks good to me. Preparing a notice of financial incentive for loyalty programs is an important step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fatima

3 months ago

Definitely D. Reviewing vendor contracts and ensuring service provider restrictions are in place is key to staying compliant.

upvoted 0 times

Micheal

2 months ago

D) Reviewing its vendor contracts to ensure that the vendors are subject to service provider restrictions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenita

2 months ago

A) Providing a mechanism for consumers to opt out of sales.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

3 months ago

I agree with Xochitl. Giving consumers the choice to opt out is crucial for privacy compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

3 months ago

I think B is the best option here. Implementing internal protocols for handling access and deletion requests is crucial for compliance with Nevada's privacy law.

upvoted 0 times