Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei Exam HC-621 Topic 1 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's HC-621 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 1
[All HC-621 Questions]

Because SAS is a serial SCSI, so the transfer rate is usually lower than parallel SCSI.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Honey
3 months ago
Serial SCSI? More like 'so slow' SCSI, am I right? *rimshot* Anyway, I'm going with True on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Twana
1 months ago
Serial SCSI may be slower, but it has its advantages too. So, True it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 months ago
I agree, it's definitely True. Parallel SCSI is faster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
2 months ago
Yeah, you're right! Serial SCSI does tend to have lower transfer rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 months ago
True. Serial SCSI does have a slower transfer rate than parallel SCSI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
2 months ago
I agree, it's definitely True. Serial SCSI is known for being slower.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
2 months ago
Yeah, you're right! Serial SCSI does have a lower transfer rate compared to parallel SCSI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emiko
3 months ago
Ah, the age-old debate of serial vs. parallel interfaces. I'll play it safe and choose True, since that's what I've always heard about SAS.
upvoted 0 times
Lorrie
3 months ago
Yeah, I've also heard that SAS has a lower transfer rate compared to parallel SCSI, so I would go with True as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
3 months ago
I agree, I think True is the correct answer when comparing SAS to parallel SCSI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elly
4 months ago
True. I agree with Eveline, SAS being a serial SCSI does result in lower transfer rates compared to parallel SCSI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
4 months ago
False. While SAS is a serial SCSI, it actually has higher transfer rates compared to parallel SCSI due to its point-to-point connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
Wait, isn't SAS supposed to be faster than parallel SCSI? I'm going to have to disagree and say False on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Kerry
3 months ago
Yeah, SAS is designed to be faster, so the answer is definitely False.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
3 months ago
I think you're right, SAS is actually faster than parallel SCSI. So, the answer is False.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eveline
4 months ago
True. SAS is indeed a serial SCSI, which typically has lower transfer rates than parallel SCSI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure SAS is a serial interface, so the transfer rate would be lower than parallel SCSI. Gotta go with True on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Dorsey
3 months ago
Definitely true, SAS being serial SCSI does have a lower transfer rate compared to parallel SCSI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
3 months ago
Yeah, SAS being serial means the transfer rate is lower than parallel SCSI. True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
3 months ago
I agree, SAS is a serial interface, so the transfer rate is usually lower than parallel SCSI. True.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel