Huawei Exam H19-435_V1.0 Topic 3 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H19-435_V1.0 exam

Question #: 12
Topic #: 3

[All H19-435_V1.0 Questions]

OceanStor 100D objects are incorrectly described as QoS and Asynchronous Capability

ASupport QoS settings for bandwidth and TPS

BIntra-DC and cross-DC redundancy through EC

CQoS settings based on bucket and user granularity are supported

DSupport 1-to-1 and 1-to-many

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Veronika at Jun 19, 2024, 04:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium H19-435_V1.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Annamae

3 months ago

I think option C) QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity are supported makes sense too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

3 months ago

Option D, support for 1-to-1 and 1-to-many? That's like asking me to choose between chocolate and vanilla ice cream. They're both delicious, but option C is the real deal!

upvoted 0 times

Tess

1 months ago

Definitely, option C provides more granularity for QoS settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

1 months ago

I agree, option C seems like the best choice for QoS settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

1 months ago

Option D sounds great, but I think option C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacey

1 months ago

Definitely, option C provides more granularity for QoS settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaunna

1 months ago

I agree, option C seems like the best choice for QoS settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharan

2 months ago

User 1: Option D sounds interesting, but I think option C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

3 months ago

I believe the correct answer is A) Support QoS settings for bandwidth and TPS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marjory

3 months ago

I agree, it seems like there may be some confusion in the description.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashleigh

3 months ago

Haha, who cares about QoS when you can have redundancy through EC? Option B is the way to go! Asynchronous Capability? More like Asynchronous Confusion!

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantell

4 months ago

I'm not sure about the other options, but I know for sure that option C is the right one. The question is straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

Keneth

2 months ago

User4: I think option D is the right one, it mentions support for 1-to-1 and 1-to-many.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

2 months ago

User3: Option C is the correct answer, it supports QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

3 months ago

User2: I believe option B is the right choice, it mentions intra-DC and cross-DC redundancy through EC.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jordan

3 months ago

User1: I think option A is correct, it supports QoS settings for bandwidth and TPS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

4 months ago

Option C is clearly the correct answer. QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity are supported by OceanStor 100D objects.

upvoted 0 times

Luisa

3 months ago

User 2: That's good to know. It's important to have that level of control over QoS settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paola

3 months ago

User 1: Option C is definitely the right choice. QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity are supported.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

4 months ago

User2: I agree, that's a key feature of OceanStor 100D objects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tashia

4 months ago

User1: Option C is definitely the right choice. QoS settings based on bucket and user granularity are supported.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elroy

4 months ago

I think the OceanStor 100D objects are incorrectly described as QoS and Asynchronous Capability.

upvoted 0 times

...