You know, I'm actually curious to see the real answer. I feel like PostGIS is so robust, it might be able to do all of these things. Guess we'll have to wait and see!
Agree with Veta. Raster processing is not really the focus of PostGIS. If I had to guess, that's the one function it can't handle as well as the others on the list.
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. PostGIS has been expanding its capabilities over the years. I think it can handle raster data these days, even if vector data is its bread and butter.
Haha, tricky question! I bet the answer is C. Raster data processing. PostGIS is great, but it's primarily focused on vector data, not rasters. That's more of a job for GDAL or other specialized tools.
I'm pretty sure PostGIS can handle all of these functions. It's a powerful spatial extension for PostgreSQL, so I don't see why any of these would be off-limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Erick
4 months agoJosphine
4 months agoAshlee
4 months agoErick
5 months agoJosphine
5 months agoErick
5 months agoMichel
6 months agoOcie
6 months agoSharmaine
6 months agoCarey
6 months agoOcie
6 months agoMargarett
7 months agoLonny
5 months agoRoslyn
5 months agoShawnda
6 months agoRolf
7 months agoBlondell
7 months agoVeta
7 months agoAnnabelle
7 months agoHelaine
7 months ago