I've read about this before and I'm pretty sure the answer is A) TRUE. When configured correctly, IPSG and DHCP Snooping can indeed generate static binding entries.
I'm not so sure about that, I think the answer might be B) FALSE because I believe IPSG static binding entries cannot be generated when working with DHCP Snooping.
Haha, Val, you're killing me with that conspiracy theory! But seriously, I'm leaning towards 'true' as well. It just makes sense that IPSG and DHCP Snooping would work together to automate the binding process.
I think we should just go with 'true' and move on. This is a certification exam, they're not trying to trick us, right? *chuckles* Or are they... *raises eyebrows mysteriously*
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I thought IPSG was more about restricting access based on IP and MAC addresses, rather than generating the bindings themselves. Anyone have a good reference we can check?
Yeah, I agree with Dominga. IPSG and DHCP Snooping are often used together to enhance network security. The IPSG static binding entries can be configured manually, but they can also be automatically generated based on the information gathered by DHCP Snooping.
Well, from what I understand, IPSG is used to prevent IP address spoofing, and DHCP Snooping can help with that by tracking IP-to-MAC address bindings. So, I'd say the statement is probably true, but I'm not 100% confident.
Bernardine
4 months agoAnnett
4 months agoBritt
4 months agoNan
4 months agoVeronica
5 months agoBritt
5 months agoNoemi
5 months agoMari
5 months agoKattie
6 months agoNoemi
6 months agoWalton
7 months agoVal
7 months agoDino
7 months agoJulene
7 months agoDominga
7 months agoJules
7 months agoLashandra
5 months agoDoug
5 months agoRene
6 months ago