Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI Exam SPHR Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's SPHR exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 4
[All SPHR Questions]

As an HR Professional you must be familiar with particular labor-based acts of congress. One such act is the Taft-Hartley Act which addressed right-to-work states and unions. What does right-to-work states mean for unions and employees?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Answer option A is correct.

Harris v. Forklift Systems Inc. was referenced in the case of same-sex harassment brought to the Supreme Court in Oncale v. Sundowner (D). Oncalehelped determine that gender is of little consequence when harassment meets the statutory requirements defined in Harris. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (B) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth (C) were also important cases aiding in interpreting the concept of sexual harassment in the workplace.

Chapter: Employee and Labor Relations

Objective: Review Questions


Contribute your Thoughts:

Adell
1 days ago
I believe that option A is correct because it allows employees to have more freedom in their decision to join a union.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
2 days ago
I agree with Shaniqua, it gives employees the choice to join a union or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
3 days ago
I think right-to-work states mean employees are not required to join a union to work.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel