A customer's infrastructure is set up to use both primary and secondary gateway clusters on the SSID profile cased on best practices. Why do they have an equal split of their 120 APs across the primary and secondary gateway clusters?
When cluster preemption is not enabled, access points (APs) will not automatically fail back to the primary gateway cluster once it is up again after having failed over to the secondary. This would result in an equal split of APs across primary and secondary clusters if both clusters are operational. Without preemption, there's no automatic rebalancing of APs back to the primary cluster, leading to the current distribution.
Your customer added third-party USB dongles to the USB ports of their AOS 10 access points. The customer uses AP-615 and AP-635 Each AP is connected with a Cat 6A cable to a CX 6300F Class 4 PoE switch All APs are in the same group in HPE Aruba Networking Central and share the same configuration However, many of the dongles do not come up.
Which option will solve this issue?
USB dongles often require additional power, which may exceed the power delivery capabilities of Class 4 PoE switches. Aruba AP-615 and AP-635 are designed to work with USB dongles that require additional power for proper operation. Since the Cat 6A cable can support higher power levels, replacing the Class 4 PoE switches with Class 6 PoE switches, which can deliver higher power, should resolve the issue with the dongles not powering up.
Exhibit.
After configuring VRRP between sw-1 and SW-2. you notice that both switches are showing as active. What could be the reason for this issue?
In VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol), only one switch should be the primary (master) for a given virtual IP address, with the other switches being backups. If both switches are showing as active, it suggests a misconfiguration where both are set to act as the primary for the same VRRP group. The exhibits provided indicate that both switches believe they are the active or primary for the VRRP group, which is an incorrect configuration.
A customer is evaluating device profiles on a CX 6300 switch. The test device has the following attributes:
* MAC address = 81:cd:93:13:ab:31
* LLDP sys-desc = iotcontroller
The test device is being assigned to the ''lot-dev'' role However, the customer requires the "lot-prod'' role be applied.
Given the configuration, what is causing the "iot-dev" role to be applied to the device'?
In device profile configuration, the device role is often determined by matching attributes such as MAC address, LLDP system description, and CDP information against defined conditions. The test device is being assigned the 'iot-dev' role because its LLDP system description matches the 'iot-lldp' group configuration that is associated with the 'iot-dev' role.
Which option shows the correct Banawidth Control for 1024 kbps down and 2048 Kops up for the SSID?
A)
B)
C)
D)
The correct Bandwidth Control settings for 1024 Kbps down and 2048 Kbps up for the SSID are shown in Option D. In Option D, the downstream is set at 1024 Kbps and the upstream at 2048 Kbps, both configured per user, which matches the requested configuration. This setup ensures that each user has a guaranteed bandwidth allocation of the specified rates when connected to the SSID, providing a controlled and predictable user experience.
Dustin
7 days agoFloyd
19 days agoShawna
21 days agoQuinn
1 months agoCatalina
2 months agoKing
2 months agoEric
2 months agoMammie
2 months agoJaime
2 months agoJohnetta
3 months agoKatina
5 months agoZona
5 months agoKeith
5 months agoLashonda
5 months agoMaile
5 months agoCora
5 months ago