BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A07 Topic 4 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A07 exam

Question #: 24
Topic #: 4

[All HPE7-A07 Questions]

Exhibit.

After configuring VRRP between sw-1 and SW-2. you notice that both switches are showing as active. What could be the reason for this issue?

AVRRP preemptive mode is disabled.

BSW-1 cam reach SW-2 on VLAN 10.

CBoth switches are configured as VRRP 'primary.'

DSW-2 has no priority configurations for VRRP 1.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

In VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol), only one switch should be the primary (master) for a given virtual IP address, with the other switches being backups. If both switches are showing as active, it suggests a misconfiguration where both are set to act as the primary for the same VRRP group. The exhibits provided indicate that both switches believe they are the active or primary for the VRRP group, which is an incorrect configuration.

by Antonio at Sep 15, 2024, 01:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE7-A07 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Joseph

21 days ago

I'm going with C. Both switches being 'primary' just sounds like a recipe for disaster. Someone needs to take a step back and reconfigure this properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodney

22 days ago

Haha, imagine if both switches were just sitting there, trying to be the boss. Like a couple of kindergarteners fighting over who gets to be the line leader.

upvoted 0 times

Desire

1 days ago

B) SW-1 cam reach SW-2 on VLAN 10.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeniffer

4 days ago

A) VRRP preemptive mode is disabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

9 days ago

C) Both switches are configured as VRRP 'primary.'

upvoted 0 times

...

Tuyet

12 days ago

B) SW-1 cam reach SW-2 on VLAN 10.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonor

16 days ago

A) VRRP preemptive mode is disabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Annice

1 months ago

Wait, wait, hold on. What if the preemptive mode is disabled? That could be the reason for the active/active state, right?

upvoted 0 times

Mitsue

4 days ago

B) SW-1 can reach SW-2 on VLAN 10.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

11 days ago

Yes, that could definitely be the reason for the active/active state.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodrigo

13 days ago

A) VRRP preemptive mode is disabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Jeannetta

1 months ago

Maybe SW-2 has no priority configurations for VRRP 1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freida

1 months ago

I believe it's because both switches are configured as VRRP 'primary.'

upvoted 0 times

...

Kiley

1 months ago

I think the reason could be that VRRP preemptive mode is disabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristine

1 months ago

You know, I was just thinking the same thing. Both switches being 'primary' in VRRP is definitely the problem here.

upvoted 0 times

Karima

13 days ago

We should also verify if SW-2 has no priority configurations for VRRP 1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitzie

15 days ago

I think the issue might be that both switches are configured as VRRP 'primary.'

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

21 days ago

But what if SW-1 can't reach SW-2 on VLAN 10?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marion

23 days ago

Maybe we should check if VRRP preemptive mode is disabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Dorsey

2 months ago

Hmm, this one's tricky. I'd say the issue is that both switches are configured as VRRP 'primary.' That doesn't seem right.

upvoted 0 times

Stephaine

14 days ago

Maybe SW-2 just doesn't have any priority configurations for VRRP 1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

25 days ago

Actually, I think both switches are configured as VRRP 'primary.'

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

1 months ago

No, I believe the problem is that SW-1 can't reach SW-2 on VLAN 10.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

1 months ago

I think the issue is that VRRP preemptive mode is disabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

...