BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A07 Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A07 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All HPE7-A07 Questions]

A customer is evaluating device profiles on a CX 6300 switch. The test device has the following attributes:

* MAC address = 81:cd:93:13:ab:31

* LLDP sys-desc = iotcontroller

The test device is being assigned to the ''lot-dev'' role However, the customer requires the "lot-prod'' role be applied.

Given the configuration, what is causing the "iot-dev" role to be applied to the device'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In device profile configuration, the device role is often determined by matching attributes such as MAC address, LLDP system description, and CDP information against defined conditions. The test device is being assigned the 'iot-dev' role because its LLDP system description matches the 'iot-lldp' group configuration that is associated with the 'iot-dev' role.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ceola
4 months ago
So, it could be a combination of both the LLDP system description and the profile precedence order?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
4 months ago
That could be a possibility too. Maybe the order needs to be adjusted for the correct role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
4 months ago
I believe the issue lies with the device-profile precedence order not being configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
5 months ago
But what about the device not supporting CDP? Could that be a factor?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
5 months ago
I think the LLDP sys-desc matching the lldp-group profile is causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
5 months ago
Candidate 2: Yeah, that could be another reason for the role assignment discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
5 months ago
Candidate 1: It could also be that the device-profile precedence order is not properly configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
5 months ago
Candidate 4: I don't think it's due to an unreachable RADIUS server, so option C can be ruled out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
5 months ago
Candidate 3: Maybe the device does not support CDP, causing the 'iot-dev' role to be applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
6 months ago
Candidate 2: I agree, the LLDP system description seems to be the reason for the role assignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
6 months ago
Candidate 1: I think the LLDP sys-desc matching the lldp-group config is causing the 'iot-dev' role to be applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
7 months ago
I'm still a bit confused about the device-profile precedence order. Isn't that also a factor in how the role is assigned?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
7 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. Maybe the 'iot-dev' role has some limitations or restrictions that the customer doesn't want for this device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
7 months ago
Hmm, good point. Maybe the customer wants the device in the 'lot-prod' role for some specific reason. Could be a security or performance requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
7 months ago
I agree with Sophia. The LLDP system description is the most likely cause here. But I wonder why the customer wants the 'lot-prod' role instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
7 months ago
I think the answer is D. The LLDP system description 'iotcontroller' matches the 'iot-dev' role configuration, so that's why it's being applied to the device.
upvoted 0 times
Theresia
6 months ago
I think so too, the LLDP system description plays a key role here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
6 months ago
But is that the only reason the 'iot-dev' role is being applied?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
6 months ago
I agree, the LLDP system description matches the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
7 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I'm not sure about the answer. The LLDP system description seems to be the key here, but I'm not sure if that's the only factor.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel