Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
HP Discussions
Exam HPE7-A04 Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion
HP Exam HPE7-A04 Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion
Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A04 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 4
[All HPE7-A04 Questions]
In a multi-AS underlay design
A
All spine switches are in the same AS while each leaf (VSX pair if used) are in their own AS
B
Every spine and every leaf is in their own AS
C
All spine and leaf switches are in one AS and the border leaf is in separate AS
D
Every spine is in their own AS while all leaf switches in one AS
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A
by
Theron
at
Oct 22, 2024, 09:03 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium HPE7-A04 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Olive
2 months ago
Option C? Really? That's like saying 'this is a wrong answer' for a multiple-choice question. Come on, these exam writers need to up their game!
upvoted
0
times
Clorinda
27 days ago
D) You must use iBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology
upvoted
0
times
...
Fallon
28 days ago
B) Either eBGP or iBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology will work
upvoted
0
times
...
Dorothea
29 days ago
A) You must use eBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Dana
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Using eBGP or iBGP gives you flexibility in the underlay design. As long as it works, who cares which one you use, right?
upvoted
0
times
...
Bernardine
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. This question seems a bit tricky. Option A or B could work, depending on the specific requirements.
upvoted
0
times
...
Vernice
2 months ago
I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.
upvoted
0
times
Rex
10 days ago
Yes, eBGP can be used for overlay routing, but iBGP is more suitable for underlay routing in this scenario.
upvoted
0
times
...
Brett
11 days ago
Using iBGP ensures better control and scalability in a multi-AS underlay network.
upvoted
0
times
...
Arthur
13 days ago
I agree, iBGP is the recommended protocol for underlay routing in a multi-AS design.
upvoted
0
times
...
Kenny
1 months ago
I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Alberta
2 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. Using either eBGP or iBGP for the underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology is a valid design.
upvoted
0
times
Francesco
2 months ago
Exactly, having the option to choose between eBGP and iBGP is beneficial.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mari
2 months ago
That makes sense, it gives flexibility in the design.
upvoted
0
times
...
Corazon
2 months ago
Yes, you can use either eBGP or iBGP for underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology.
upvoted
0
times
...
Elvis
2 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Bettyann
2 months ago
I disagree, iBGP can also work in this design
upvoted
0
times
...
Lisandra
3 months ago
I think we should use eBGP for underlay routing
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Olive
2 months agoClorinda
27 days agoFallon
28 days agoDorothea
29 days agoDana
2 months agoBernardine
2 months agoVernice
2 months agoRex
10 days agoBrett
11 days agoArthur
13 days agoKenny
1 months agoAlberta
2 months agoFrancesco
2 months agoMari
2 months agoCorazon
2 months agoElvis
2 months agoBettyann
2 months agoLisandra
3 months ago