Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A04 Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A04 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 4
[All HPE7-A04 Questions]

In a multi-AS underlay design

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Olive
16 days ago
Option C? Really? That's like saying 'this is a wrong answer' for a multiple-choice question. Come on, these exam writers need to up their game!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
17 days ago
Option B is the way to go. Using eBGP or iBGP gives you flexibility in the underlay design. As long as it works, who cares which one you use, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
21 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. This question seems a bit tricky. Option A or B could work, depending on the specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
22 days ago
I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
11 days ago
I think Option D is correct. iBGP should be used for the underlay routing in a multi-AS environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alberta
1 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. Using either eBGP or iBGP for the underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology is a valid design.
upvoted 0 times
Francesco
22 days ago
Exactly, having the option to choose between eBGP and iBGP is beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
29 days ago
That makes sense, it gives flexibility in the design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
30 days ago
Yes, you can use either eBGP or iBGP for underlay routing in a leaf and spine topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
1 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettyann
1 months ago
I disagree, iBGP can also work in this design
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
2 months ago
I think we should use eBGP for underlay routing
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel