Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A03 Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A03 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 1
[All HPE7-A03 Questions]

A global cruise line company needs to refresh its current fleet. They win refresh the insides' of the ship to be cost-effective and increase their sustain ability. They Mill replace the complete WLAN/LAN hardware of the ship. In this refresh, the company will not refresh Us current security requirements. The CIO also wants to limit the number of unused ports in the switches. Future expansion will always mean a refresh of hardware. They start with the smallest ship with a maximum of 800 guests

Each ship has a LAN infrastructure consisting of two core switches, up to 10 redundant distribution switches, and up to 500 access switches (400 cabins. 100 technical rooms). The Core switches are located in the MDF of the ship and the distribution switches are located in the IDFs of the ship. Each cabin and technical room gets one single access switch.

The cabling structure of the ship will not be refreshed. Each IDF is connected to the MDF by SMF. of which two pairs are available for the interconnect between the core and distribution. The length of SM fiber between MDF and IDF is less than 300 meters (930 ft) and the type used is 0S1. Each cabin is connected by a single 0M2 pair to the IDF. the maximum length is 60 meters (200 ft). Each technical room is connected by a single 0M2 pail to the IDF. with lengths between 100 and 150 meters (320 and 500 ft).

For each cabin/technical room the customer is looking to replace their current fan-less 2530/2540 without changing the requirements, except they need to upgrade the uplink to distribution switch to 10GbEto handle the increased network traffic, and the technical rooms need redundant power.

The WLAN infrastructure will be 1:1 refreshed without new cabling or new AP locations. Their WLAN Infrastructure is based on the 200/300 series Indoor and outdoor APs running instantOS (less than 300 APs). the customer has no change in WLAN requirements.

The cruise line company will replace its current Internet connection before the LAN/WLAN refresh. The new Internet connection will provide a 99.8% uptime, which is needed to ensure the paid guest Wi-Fi is always operational. With this new internet connection, the CIO of the cruise line wants to base the design on the ESP architecture from Aruba because Internet connection is guaranteed.

Based on the best practices, what should you recommend as the most cost-effective switch model for the cabins?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

For the cabin switches in the global cruise line's fleet refresh project, the most cost-effective switch model that meets the requirement for fan-less operation, 10GbE uplink capability, and PoE support is the HPE Aruba Networking 6200F 12G Class4 PoE 2G/2SFP+. This switch model offers a compact form factor with sufficient port density for cabin connectivity, Power over Ethernet for powering devices directly through the network cable, and SFP+ ports for high-speed uplink connections to the distribution switches. This choice is in line with the company's aim to upgrade the network infrastructure to handle increased traffic while maintaining a focus on cost-effectiveness and sustainability. The 6200F series is designed for exactly such environments, providing reliable performance and energy efficiency, which is crucial for the limited space and power availability in a ship setting.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Phung
2 months ago
But option D might be too expensive for the company's budget. We need to consider cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
2 months ago
The 6100 126 switch is the clear winner here. It's like a Swiss Army knife - it's got everything the cruise line needs, and it won't sink their budget. Arrr, matey!
upvoted 0 times
Annabelle
27 days ago
A: Plus, it's reliable and cost-effective. It's a win-win for the cruise line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
29 days ago
B: Yeah, it has all the features we need without breaking the bank.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
1 months ago
A: I agree, the 6100 126 switch seems like the best choice for the cabins.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivan
2 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if the cruise line could save a few doubloons by going with the 6000 126 switch. I mean, who needs all those fancy SFP+ ports anyway? Just kidress the seagulls and let them carry the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
2 months ago
The 6200F 12G Class 4 PoE 2G/2SFP+ switch is overkill for the cabins. The 6100 126 is the perfect choice to meet the requirements without breaking the bank.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
2 months ago
I agree with Zoila. The 6100 126 switch is the way to go. It's a good balance between cost-effectiveness and the necessary features.
upvoted 0 times
Marilynn
19 days ago
Yes, it's important to consider both cost and necessary features when choosing the switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
20 days ago
The 6100 126 switch does seem like a good option for the cabins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
1 months ago
I agree, it seems to have the right balance of features and cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
1 months ago
I think the 6100 126 switch is a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Soledad
2 months ago
I'm not sure, I think option D might be a better choice for the cabins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
2 months ago
The 6100 126 Class 4 PoE 2G/2SFP+ switch seems like the most cost-effective option for the cabins. It has the required uplink speed and enough ports to handle the increased network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
26 days ago
Yes, cost-effectiveness is key when refreshing the fleet. The 6100 126 Class 4 PoE 2G/2SFP+ switch fits the bill perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
27 days ago
Plus, it's cost-effective which is always a bonus for the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
1 months ago
It definitely meets the requirements for the network traffic and has the necessary uplink speed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
1 months ago
I agree, the 6100 126 Class 4 PoE 2G/2SFP+ switch is a good choice for the cabins.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pa
2 months ago
I agree with you, Phung. Option C seems to meet the requirements while being cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
2 months ago
I think the most cost-effective switch model for the cabins would be option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel